Fire Mike Shula Now!

We've moved visit & bookmark us at CapstoneReport.com

2006-12-22T17:30:00.000-08:00

Visit us at CapstoneReport.com

Recent reports we've posted at CapstoneReport.com:

The salary war: Would a big coaching salary be bad for Alabama or college football?

Alabama warming to Houston Nutt?

Festivus Eve

Profootballtalk.com: Saban option remains open

Air of confidence: Saban remains focus, but it is a high stakes game Moore is playing

Finebaum to WJOX?

Testing new site: Feedback appreciated

2006-12-22T14:12:00.000-08:00

never mind, I got the same obnoxious thing on a second visit. Once I get that fixed I'll repost asking for more feedback. Thanks.

Just to scare you...

2006-12-22T11:55:00.000-08:00

Alabama warming to Houston Nutt? Is Sexton pulling a bait and switch? Could this be a real Nightmare before Christmas?

FESTIVUS EVE

2006-12-22T11:00:00.000-08:00

Get your decorations here. Also get ready for the feats of strength!

Profootballtalk.com: Saban option remains open

2006-12-22T10:19:00.000-08:00

Profootballtalk.com said this morning the Saban denial didn't convince them. "We still don't buy it. Common sense suggests that Alabama wouldn't have made an offer to Saban absent some indication that Saban was interested. And with new ownership of the Fins on the horizon (we ain't backing off of that one yet), Saban is smart to keep all options open."

Air of confidence: Saban remains focus, but it is a high stakes game Moore is playing

2006-12-22T06:01:00.000-08:00

Listening to outsiders, the Alabama coaching search is a disaster. But if you listen to those close to the program or in the administration, there seems to be an air of confidence that this search will end on a positive note. There is not a frantic scramble. There is no panic. The University is moving ahead, privately, with its coaching search.

Despite the Thursday afternoon denial by Nick Saban, a person close to the administration (OH MY, DID I JUST USE THE ANONYMOUS SOURCE?!?), insisted Saban remains the candidate. On Wednesday afternoon, Saban told reporters he would not be the Alabama coach. It was his most specific denial to date. However, elements of Saban's story have contradicted versions of the story relayed by his agent Jimmy Sexton.

Previously, Sexton told the media that Alabama had not contacted him about Nick Saban. Later, Saban told the media, Alabama had contacted his agent, but Saban said he declined to discuss the opportunity since he wanted to stay with the Dolphins.

Someone's not telling the truth. You can bet it is the agent.

It appears from the beginning, Alabama Athletic Director Mal Moore wanted Saban.

He offered only an half-hearted attempt at Steve Spurrier, then followed that up with the Rich Rodriguez fiasco.

Moore was willing to settle for Rodriguez and to be honest that wasn't a bad decision. Rodriguez would've offered Alabama new blood and a new direction for the football program. It would have been a safe hire and ended weeks of speculation begun prior to the ouster of Mike Shula. However, someone, possibly University bureaucrats involved in the negotiations or perhaps Mal Moore or Dr. Robert Witt or even members of the Board of Trustees, interfered with the process. The result was an offer to Rodriguez, which was easily matched by West Virginia. The offer also complicated the relationship with Rodriguez. The coach was frustrated by the unsatisfactory offer (an offer paying him substantially less than Auburn's Tommy Tuberville.)

The numerous leaks within the University scuttled the Rodriguez deal by allowing UWV to craft a counteroffer. Leaks plagued the entire process and led to a credibility problem for the University and its officials.

The situation now has Mal Moore sitting in a high-stakes game of poker. Like the gambler, he's holding them, waiting on the end of the NFL season. There is a very real danger involved if Saban is not hired. Moore missed out on his best chance to play it safe and the Rodriguez hire was botched. Now there is no turning back. If Alabama doesn't land an A-list coach, the focus of fan discontent will fall squarely on Moore. For the moment, people around the program seem confident, but in the background consultant Chuck Neinas has worked on a doomsday back-up plan in case the Saban gamble fails.

Other news: From the Miami Herald, denials are not enough to be convincing.

Finebaum to WJOX?

2006-12-22T05:51:00.000-08:00

With Herb Winches out at WJOX is the way paved for Paul Finebaum to broadcast on FM and overcome the weak signal strength of WERC? According to the Birmingham News, Winches left WJOX due to its courting of Finebaum and a refusal to play on the "B-Team."

KEY QUOTES: He referred questions to his attorney, Russ Campbell, who said talk Finebaum might leave WERC is just "industry speculation." AND Daniels declined to say if Finebaum is a candidate to take Winches' place at WJOX.

Those are weak denials. There is obvious interest in the WJOX job by Finebaum. You can't trust his lawyer's weak denials. Where there is smoke there is fire. My sister's grocer's plumber's hairdresser said it was a done deal: Finebaum to WJOX.

Oh wait, I'm supposed to say those things about Saban. Just ignore that last paragraph.

Saban denies interest in Alabama job

2006-12-21T14:22:00.000-08:00

Saban: 'I'm not going to be the Alabama coach'

In his most vigorous public statement yet, Nick Saban said he would not be Alabama's coach next season. This despite a day filled with rumors and radio reports saying Saban was Alabama-bound.

Cutcliffe, Bielema and Jack Del Rio to Alabama? That's just stupid

2006-12-21T07:27:00.000-08:00

I didn't address this before because it was a stupid rumor created by a stupid commentator, but with the boring lack of information, this rumor is picking up supporters. It's stupid not because David Cutcliffe is a bad coach. On the contrary, he's a good coach who shouldn't have been fired by Ole Miss. What makes the idea stupid is Ivan Maisel suggested it.

Here's a simple rule: anyone Maisel suggests hiring would really be bad for Alabama.

While that appears axiomatic, it is certainly highlighted in this case. Alabama doesn't need to hire Cutcliffe because there are plenty of other coaches who are younger or more successful still available for the University to hire.

But the fearful fans demand we cease our search and "hire someone, anyone" now to staunch the PR and recruiting problems. As I've said before, the recruiting fears are a consistent posting of a small, but vocal minority of Alabama fans. The worst thing Alabama could do would be hire a lower-tier coach just to keep this year's recruiting class safe. A solid hire will keep the class together. And judging on a conversation I had, most of the Alabama prospects haven't wavered in their commitments. There are some big name recruits at risk, but a good hire prevents their defection or could bring them back into the fold. A bad hire not only sets back this year's class, but could harm several seasons.

Cutcliffe was knocked at Ole Miss for his failure as a recruiter. Of course panicked fans would rush head first into a bad hire. Let's stay the course. The dead period is here, the bowl season and NFL season will be over soon.

Other names just as absurd
Mark Edwards wrote in the Decatur Daily that Navy's Paul Johnson, Wisconsin's Bret Bielema and the Jacksonville Jaguars' Jack Del Rio are considered back-ups to Nick Saban. I think it is safe to say it won't be Bielema or Del Rio. Those names are just ludicrous.

He also questions why waiting for Saban is worth it. "I'm having a hard time figuring out why he's worth so much. His history says that even if he comes to Alabama, he'll leave quickly Â probably after four years or less, maybe when the next good NFL offer comes along," Edwards wrote.

I'm sorry. Saban is one of the best coaches around. Would it be better to hire a second-tier coach or a proven winner? The best bet is the winner. On a second note, the idea of Saban quickly leaving Alabama isn't a reason not to hire him. The problem is the analysis that Saban would leave based on history is afallaciouss assumption.

History can't be used to prove future performance. The reason is that in the past, Saban was working to get to his goal, the NFL. What happens when you realize your goal wasn't what you wanted?

How long was Bryant at Maryland, Kentucky and Texas A&M? Answer, Bryant was at Maryland one season, at Kentucky eight seasons and at Texas A&M four years.

My point? Good coaches job hop moving up the chain. And sometimes they make lateral or puzzling moves, but saying Saban doesn't stay a place long enough is a very bad reason not to hire him.

Hiring decisions should be about getting the best talent, not getting someone known more for loyalty than excellence. Hiring for loyalty is what got us stuck with Mal Moore as AD.

The most cynical appointment since Caligula made his horse a senator

2006-12-21T06:42:00.000-08:00

As I reflect on UAB's hiring of Neil Callaway, I'm struck by what amounts to the most cynical appointment since Caligula named his horse, Incitatus, to the Senate and attempted to make him a consul. It really was a horrible hire, not because Callaway is a bad coach, but because UAB ignored what could be more important than X's and O's--excitement.

Since the UAB program began, nobody has been excited about it. Not even a dramatic win over LSU could lift the program into the public's consciousness. The small, underdog program on Birmingham's Southside hasn't gained traction for lots of reasons, but perhaps the main reason is our cultural need for escapism.

As southerners, we are lambasted by the national media on a consistent basis. They'll make fun of the way we talk, the foods we eat and our passion for sports. But this passion comes from the fact we can excel on the gridiron in the way we haven't on other fields. Alabama and Auburn are top programs ready to compete for championships, but UAB is a program still in its early years, facing the troubles of adolescence.

One theory says UAB fails because Birmingham won't support a team (any team pro or college.) While the last few years of the Birmingham Fire and other laughable pro experiments have hurt Birmingham's image as the Football Capital of the South, one cannot look past how the community supported teams like the Americans and of course the Stallions of the USFL.

Of course the USFL days were a different time and Legion Field was in a different class back then. The stadium is a dump. Any time I go there I fear for my life because the area surrounding the stadium is dangerous.

The worries over safety keep many families at home who would otherwise consider a trip to watch a UAB game.

But the safety fears aren't the only thing keeping people away. If it were safety, then all those Hoover and Prattville people who attended the state championship game (approximately 30,000 fans on a cold Saturday afternoon) would have just stayed home and watched the game on television.

Why did those fans attend?

It was the excitement. Hoover fans were excited about the program, the chance of another title and the show the Hoover offense provided.

When have UAB fans ever been that excited about anything?

So when Hoover's coach Rush Propst said he was interested in going to college and was specifically interested in the UAB job, you would think administrators would at least give him a call.

It didn't happen. UAB administrators were enamored with Jimbo Fisher. While Fisher has a higher profile, he would not have excited the fans until he won football games. Depending on what story you believe, the UA system trustees either told UAB to forget Fisher or they didn't. Whatever the case, UAB moved from Fisher to Callaway. Whatever the case, UAB props up the football program with money from the president's discretionary fund.

The UAB program was bleeding money and should not have hired Fisher based on sound financial reasons. However, there was no reason to avoid hiring Propst. Propst would have come cheap in comparison to Fisher and could have energized the fans around Birmingham to maybe care about the Blazers.

In any event, Callaway is the coach and the hiring looks like a cynical move by the UAB president and athletic department staff. On second thought, cynical probably isn't the right description. Maybe incompetent would be a better word.

LOOKING AT THE BOWLS

2006-12-21T06:22:00.000-08:00

Papa John's Bowl notes from the Birmingham News has this disturbing quote about Legion Field: They Said It: "I love this stadium. It's one of the best ones I've played in. It's so big." - East Carolina wide receiver Phillip Henry on Legion Field.

Wow. Legion Field is a dump. It is a dump dump. The stadium continues to deteriorate as the neighborhood surrounding it. The city of Birmingham made a serious mistake in not spending the money necessary to keep the stadium in good condition. Of course the city made a major mistake in not investing in urban renewal and revitalization around the Legion Field and Birmingham Southern area.

Independence Bowl preview: The Mobile Press Register attempts to answer the question of how Dave Radar's offense would work post-Mike Shula. But the story misses key problems with Alabama's offense systemic to Mike Shula's system, namely, lack of toughness and discipline. I've always given Shula a pass on his offensive play calling. In most respects his play calling was not as conservative as a Gene Stallings-era team; other times it was more conservative, but conservative by itself wasn't the problem.

The problem always focused on how the offensive line and other players just were not tough enough to execute plays. With Kines as interim head coach, the team should execute better because practices are being run more efficiently and intensely. You can call the best play in the world, but if the players can't execute it, then it doesn't mater. At the very least, Alabama has the opportunity to look better in the bowl than it has all season, but that is hard to predict with all the distractions which the team has faced.

Alabama defeats NC State 82-75

2006-12-21T06:14:00.000-08:00

Richard Hendrix was the big star of the game scoring 23 points and grabbing 12 rebounds. The win keeps the 10th ranked Alabama Crimson Tide on course for the start of the SEC season. The team shows potential, but must improve to make a real and sustained run to the Final Four.

Ronald Steele's knee problems are a concern. According to the Birmingham News, Star point guard Ronald Steele shrugged off recent ankle and knee injuries to start Wednesday, but he went to the bench late in the game with cramps in his left calf muscle. Missing its leader, the Tide couldn't convincingly put the Wolfpack away.

The road win over an ACC team should help the team come tournament time in March when the bids and seeding are done.

NY Times takes another shot at Auburn

2006-12-20T11:34:00.000-08:00

The NY Times takes on the NCAA and Auburn University in an editorial today, click here to read the entire editorial. The NY Times points out how athletics can corrupt not only the athletic side of the university but can seep into other areas as well. Worth reading.

An excerpt that points out the major problem Auburn fans can't seem to comprehend:

An internal audit by the university, made public this month, has uncovered a new round of problems. It found that a grade for a scholarship athlete had been changed — from an incomplete to an A — without the professor’s knowledge. This conveniently raised the athlete’s grade point average in the final semester just above the minimum required for graduation. In addition, the athlete received three other A’s from so-called “directed reading” courses that required no classroom attendance. The professor who issued the initial incomplete in 2003 — and only recently learned it had been changed — suggested that someone in the university had guided the athlete through the scheduling process.

Saban, Gruden center of speculation

2006-12-20T07:20:00.000-08:00

Two names are at the center of NFL speculation regarding Alabama's head coaching search: Nick Saban and Jon Gruden. And since the plumber has plugged most leaks, speculation is about all we have left.

As said about 100 times, the Saban situation is interesting because NFL sources repeatedly indicate he is interested. When you couple that with Alabama's obvious interest, then you've got the one person who is the frontrunner.

Gruden's name is interesting because it gets hotter every day in the Alabama coaching discussion. While Gruden is safe in Tampa for at least another season, there is growing media attention to a Gruden possibility. Much of the media attention is speculation; however, it is clear Neinas has contacted most coaches in the U.S. (and we hear even a few "football" coaches from Mexico and Cuba.) Gruden was probed for interest and could be open to listening to the University.

The post-Christmas/New Year period will be an interesting time as the NFL season ends and the bowl season concludes.

Self doubt could lead to bad head coach

2006-12-18T07:25:00.000-08:00

One of the worst things for your blood pressure is to read Internet message boards. And I'm not talking about the Auburn or Tennessee boards where opposing fans are critical of Alabama. The most depressing message boards have Alabama fans who either can find 100 reasons to be critical of a coaching candidate or can find 100 reasons to hire Joe Kines or you might even find the more panic-induced pleas to hire "someone...Anyone" now to salvage recruiting.

With no real news on the Alabama coaching search, some Alabama fans have taken their frustrations out on message boards. One of the most irritating things to do is to read message board posts bashing coaching candidates. These posts run from the expected Johnson's offense at Navy won't work in the SEC to the more idiotic, Saban sucks and we don't want him.

There are legitimate positives and negatives to every coaching candidate. And that's a fact Which some fans fail to realize. Does Saban have some drawbacks? Sure, but his positives--winning at MSU and LSU, 2 SEC crowns and 1 national championship in five years at LSU are big pluses. The most common criticism of Saban involves his short stays at every school.

Here is a trivia question: How long was Bryant at Maryland, Kentucky and Texas A&M?

Answer, Bryant was at Maryland one season, at Kentucky eight seasons and at Texas A&M four years.

My point? Good coaches job hop moving up the chain.

And sometimes they make lateral or puzzling moves, but saying Saban doesn't stay a place long enough is a very bad reason not to hire him.

The same could be said of someone like Navy's Johnson. He's won everywhere he's been and he knows how to make his schemes fit his talent. Coaching at the service academies is a difficult thing to do. Those schools aren't talent rich like the SEC or other programs, but he still has won.

Are their drawbacks to hiring someone like Johnson? Absolutely, his lack of name recognition would probably hurt recruiting the first year. But the discipline he would bring and experience he possesses would be a big improvement over the Shula and Dubose years.

The recruiting fears are a consistent posting of a small, but vocal minority of Alabama fans. Some want to hold out for a marquee name (probably the wisest course of action) and a subset of this group who wants "someone, anyone" right now to staunch the bleeding. The worst thing Alabama could do would be hire a lower-tier coach just to keep this year's recruiting class intact.

A solid hire will keep the class together. And judging on a conversation I had, most of the Alabama prospects haven't wavered in their commitments. There are some big name recruits at risk, but a good hire prevents their defection or could bring them back into the fold. A bad hire not only sets back this year's class, but could harm several seasons.

The growing sound of fans asking for Joe Kines as head coach isn't a testament to a faith in Kines, but rather exasperation with the hiring process. First, the firing of Shula lingered a week, so we ended up with Shula-fatigue and after about three weeks of coaching gossip fans are now weary of the coaching search. This fatigue combined with some fans sensitivity to national media criticism makes a Joe Kines for head coach movement possible. While I have nothing against Kines, in fact I believe he would make a good head coach and should have been hired instead of Shula following the Price fiasco, right now Kines is not the man for the job.

If you fans want a PR nightmare, name Kines.

But the PR aspects of this coaching search shouldn't be our main concern. The blowhards on ESPN will have their laugh, but with patience and the right hire we can end up laughing for years to come.

What the news is: It is now clear Alabama is waiting on Nick Saban. Whether Saban ends up the coach or not, nobody knows. But there is a clear effort on the part of the University to pursue the NFL option. Moore could have about a dozen second or third-tier college coaches, but he hasn't rushed to fill the slot; therefore, he is waiting on his first choice to finish the season. There is sufficient evidence from the NFL and other sources indicating Saban could consider bolting. The potential sale of the Dolphins is a rumor which shows the NFL team could lack stability. Futhermore, Saban wants to feel needed. His personality needs to feel important and the fans at the University would shower him with the desired reverence. Predicting anything in this circus is not wise. But we can say with certainty Alabama is looking at the NFL and looking at Saban.

For some of the interesting stories:
CECIL HURT: No early Christmas gift for UA

UAB hires Callaway
What a horrible move for UAB. They shouldn't have gone after Fisher or anyone but Rush Propst. Propst would have brought excitement to UAB and gotten fans in the Birmingham area interested in what was happening. It is probably better for Propst he didn't go into such a horrible situation. If UAB's search committee wouldn't even consider interviewing Propst you know the UAB administration has real problems.

FIRE MIKE SHULA NOW! NAMED TIME PERSON OF THE YEAR!

2006-12-16T21:38:00.000-08:00

Time Magazine has named its person of the year and it is everyone creating content on the Internet. OK, so maybe the headline is a little misleading; however, there is no doubt about the role blogs from Memphis Tider to Fire Mike Shula Now! to Roll Bama Roll and on and on have made in the way information is exchanged regarding Alabama football.

"It's a tool for bringing together the small contributions of millions of people and making them matter. Silicon Valley consultants call it Web 2.0, as if it were a new version of some old software. But it's really a revolution." --Time

With the old media composed of the Birmingham News, Huntsville Times, etc. being consistently wrong, the new media of blogs and message boards provides a check and balance on the runaway train of the 24-hour news cycle. By joining together in blogs and message boards, we can hold the old media accountable--expose mistakes--and by working together discover the truth.

Let's not stop now. Let's continue to hold the old media accountable and forge a new path via the information superhighway.

Trouble within: Alabama's Dysfunctional Management

2006-12-16T07:43:00.000-08:00

For those that missed it:

Tommy Gallion alleged in a Friday afternoon interview on the Paul Finebaum Radio Network that persons within the athletic dept. and the administration were the reasons for the last decade of instability for the University.

Specific Gallion allegations were: Marie Robbins and Gene Marsh were major problems for the athletic department. He said Marsh stabbed the University in the back in an effort to curry favor with the NCAA so he could become chairman of the COI. He also was disappointed in Dr. Witt's reaction to the lawsuit against the NCAA. Gallion alleged the University was attempting to cover up for "one of their own."

He said former University president Andrew Sorensen and others cared about personal agendas over the good of the University. Gallion said, Dubose felt the athletic administration (particularly Marsh and Robbins) were problems for running the football program. Gallion defended Dennis Franchione and said Franchione had major problems with Marsh and Robbins. Franchione could not run the program without interference from outside the football program.

This program has been destroyed methodically over the last five or ten years and for any chance of recovery, Alabama must "burn everyone out of the nest and start over," Gallion said.

ANALYSIS: Gallion's thoughts were interesting, but in my opinion there are many additional problems within the bureaucracy. I also do not believe Dr. Witt is a problem for the University. In fact, Dr. Witt's integrity makes him the only real hope for righting the ship.

Media meltdown: Alabama coaching search

2006-12-15T12:14:00.000-08:00

Real attention being given to the horrible media coverage of the Alabama coaching search.

While the media consistently butchers stories of far greater social and global significance (Katrina, the Sago Mine tragedy, Iraq and on and on), it's worth pointing out that the coverage of the Alabama coaching situation has been one of the sorriest two-week spectacles in the history of college football reportage. The amount of ink spilled--and technical equipment used--to document utterly false stories about Steve Spurrier, Nick Saban and (now) Rich Rodriguez is a profound waste of resources — and a profound insult to the intelligence of the masses, in both Tuscaloosa and Morgantown.
Nationally and in the state of Alabama, news outlets have made one erroneous report after another, filling broadcasts, column inches, cyberspace, and newsprint with rumors upon rumors but precious few facts. The lessons that need to be learned by military reporters and political correspondents are the same lessons that need to be learned by a great many Alabama journalists and college football insiders: get the story right, and forget about trying to get the story first. ---Matthew Zemek on Foxsports.com

Auburn, UAB: Nobody Cares

2006-12-15T10:37:00.000-08:00

I've always wondered what a NY Met fan feels like. He's always living in the shadow of Ruth and Mantle and about 1,000 other baseball greats, and don't forget the championships.

Living in Alabama, Auburn fans (and all three UAB fans) are living in the eternal shadow of the Alabama program. It doesn't matter how many games Tuberville wins or how many championships Auburn earns, they'll always be second-rate. Alabama is the name people care about.

If Auburn were important, then you'd hear real discussion about the academic fraud at Auburn, reported in the NY Times because no sports writer in the state has the balls to tell the truth. Truth is, if it were involving Alabama, the academic fraud would be front page material around the country just like the Tennessee allegations were about a decade ago.

Nobody, not even major SEC rivals really care about Auburn. But Alabama. Now that is a different story.

Visit Alabama message boards and you have idiot South Carolina fans or idiot fans of other SEC schools trying to start heated arguments. Why? Because the Alabama name means something schools like Auburn and South Carolina and UAB lack. The Alabama name still sparks concern. Despite our decade of discontent (brought on by our own hubris), other teams worry about a resurgence of Alabama football. Look at message boards for teams like Tennessee and in the last month you'll find more focus on the Alabama coaching search than their own bowl game.

Fans at these other schools want to point fingers and say the days of Bryant will never come again.

That prophecy is most likely true.

However, when Bryant arrived the same thing was said about how this school would never recapture the days of Wallace Wade and Frank Thomas. In fact, Bryant eclipsed the past.

Great football programs like Notre Dame, Alabama, USC, Texas, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Nebraska, Michigan and Ohio State find ways to resurface. Each of these schools have lived through periods of misfortune, discontent and frustration, but each of these schools have rebounded.

Alabama rebounded before and it will rebound again. That is why small-minded fans from other institutions come here mocking our present decade of misfortune. They know it won't last. They know the recipe for a return to glory is at hand. It worries them.

And what about Auburn and UAB? Nobody anywhere really cares about them.

Miami Dolphins up for sale?

2006-12-14T18:54:00.000-08:00

Talk is the Papa John's founder may buy stake in the pro football team.

Could this be involved in Nick Saban's decision making for next season?

What Alabama Needs

2006-12-14T08:18:00.000-08:00

Patience
The recruiting dead period is about to begin, and there really is no way to get a coach in place and recruiting before the bowl season starts. The wisest course of action is to hire a great coach sometime in early January. A great coach would stabilize recruiting and excite the fan base not only this year, but for years to come.

Characteristics of a great coach
A great coach could be someone like a Nick Saban (and we know Saban is still a major target.) A big name coach would generate confidence and encourage recruits who want to play for a proven winner.

But a great coach does not necessarily have to be the biggest name on the coaching leaderboard. A great coaching hire could be someone with a good record who possesses something just as important: The IT factor.

A good coaching hire would be someone who could come into the press conference and wow the audience. It would be the polar opposite of Mike Shula's walking-dead press conference. After Shula was named at the press conference, not one person I spoke with was confident; in fact people were worried--Shula's performance was that abysmal.

But a coach with a winning personality and who understands how to utilize the media would be a big step in the right direction. Recruiting today is about winning and it is about image. Our image would take a nice big boost with a media-savvy coach.

A big name?
"Even Bryant wasn't a rock-star name when he was hired," one person wrote me. I hate to correct that misconception, but when Bryant was hired he was one of the hotter names in coaching. It was Bryant who had won an SEC championship at Kentucky and then moved on to win an SWC crown at Texas A&M. Even then those were considered impressive feats by football experts.

Hiring a big name is a short-cut to credibility and success. A coach like a Saban could come into the program, raise expectations and immediately gain success. An unknown coach could come into the program and have success, but would it have an immediate impact? It depends on the hire. That is why patience is so important. Anyone can coach Alabama, but we want the right coach.

Whatever Alabama hires, big name, small name or unknown, one thing to keep in mind is every single Alabama coach over the last 45+years has won 10-games or more at least once during their tenure. So whoever comes to Alabama, at least once during their tenure, they will likely compete for the SEC and perhaps even the national title. As long as the coach is competent (unlike Bill Curry, Mike Dubose or Mike Shula) then Alabama's future is bright.
Take a deep breath and enjoy the holiday season.

And in the holiday spirit, I'm going to post a few great Alabama gift ideas:

The Missing Ring:How Bear Bryant and the 1966 Alabama Crimson Tide were Denied College Football's Most Elusive Prize

Tales from Alabama Prep Football by Ron Ingram and Rubin E. Grant

Game of My Life: Memorable Stories of Crmimson Tide Football

Crimson Classics: The 25 Greatest Plays In Alabama Football History

Coaching search has broad NFL focus

2006-12-13T07:07:00.000-08:00

Chuck Neinas and Alabama are calling a wide-number of NFL coaches from the marquee names to the lesser-knowns. One coach contacted by Alabama was Jim Haslett, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Haslett now a defensive coordinator with the Rams was formally a head coach with the New Orleans Saints. The Post-Dispatch said Haslett was not interested in the job. And it is hard to think Alabama was seriously interested in him; however, it is a serious indicator about the broad NFL focus of the present search.

With rumors persisting about college coaches, it is possible Alabama would settle for a coach from the college ranks. But most of the focus post-Rodriguez has centered on the NFL.

Coaching search: Another disaster looming?

2006-12-12T07:31:00.000-08:00

A report in the Birmingham News said: "Alabama does not want to change the economics of college football." It goes on to say Saban would be an exception.

ANALYSIS: If the Birmingham News report is accurate (and that is a big IF with that newspaper) then the statement about Alabama's payment options are a real concern. If the administration has given in to bureaucrats and plans to offer a below market salary then expect this coaching search to be a disaster. Rodriguez expressed to the media his dismay over Alabama's offer--an offer that did not meet the pay for Auburn's Tommy Tuberville. Unless the next coach is offered a wow-inducing salary, then this coaching search will quickly enter the realm of chaos.

This morning's Tuscaloosa News verified aspects of our report yesterday. Here are some highlights of the reports and a brief analysis.
"Sources said Mal Moore and Dr. Robert Witt have evaluated the hiring process and proceeded to determine their next move..."

"Alabama could wait on a collegiate or NFL coaching candidates to conclude their final games before offering the Alabama job.""Numerous potential candidates have been contacted by UA’s consulting firm, the Neinas Group, to gather background information."

"No timetable."

The Mobile Press-Register reports what other media outlets reported, the search could last until the end of the month or even into early January.

Analysis: There is broad consensus now the search will last a few weeks. As always this could change if some forces push Moore toward another college coach; however, the bowl season and with just a few weeks remaining in the NFL season, it would seem illogical to rush a hire out. The Christmas holiday also would seem to prevent much action. It has been said numerous times, the longer the search goes the more likely Saban could bolt from the NFL. We believe the search is focused on the NFL with no college coach presently high on the Alabama list. If this changes, then it could be the administration has wilted from internal pressures.

NFL focus of Alabama search; Saban, Gruden, Neuheisel hot topics

2006-12-11T15:10:00.000-08:00

The University of Alabama's list of coaching candidates was expanded over the weekend with a broader focus on NFL head coaches.

The feeling was that Nick Saban remained a very strong possibility for the University. Saban's interest was seemingly confirmed by at least two NFL reporters (including Peter King). Saban's Monday press conference included a non-denial denial.

Jon Gruden's name became scorching hot over the weekend and on Monday. Gruden is considered a top-notch coach and also, according to insiders, a growing possibility. Gruden said in his Monday press conference he was not worried about his future in Tampa Bay. "I don't worry about those things, I really don't," Gruden said.

The most interesting name to emerge as a serious contender over the weekend was that of Rick Neuheisel. Currently an NFL assistant, Neuheisel posted a career Division 1A collegiate record of 66-30 with a Pac-10 title and a Rose Bowl appearance. There was some indication that Neuheisel has shown some interest in the job via back channels.

Other information from the weekend indicates Moore and Dr. Witt have not abandoned the desire to hire a head coach. People close to the University continue to insist the search can be salvaged and would not end in the unmitigated disaster that hiring an assistant coach would bring.

Likewise, despite the lingering name of Houston Nutt, the University is not interested in him.

Alabama reflects on coaching search, sets new outline to salvage the situation

2006-12-10T20:16:00.000-08:00

Dr. Robert Witt was provided a detailed status report on the coaching search by Athletic Director Mal Moore following the Rodriguez debacle. The report was the first opportunity to examine the reasons for the Rodriguez failure and to determine whether the Alabama coaching search could be salvaged.

Recommendations from the discussion are believed to have included further compartmentalization of the coaching search. This tightening of the information could prevent regular staff members of the athletic department from being given information customary for their positions (ie: information used in crafting deals, event planning, etc.) The leaks are considered a serious problem for this coaching search and are believed to have come from many athletic department employees. It has damaged contact with at least four coaches being courted by the University. In the Rodriguez case, the leaks created a strategic disadvantage for the University by allowing WVU boosters to create a counter-offer incentive package to keep the coach in Morgantown.

Other recommendations were to modify the University's financial packages and to start a new list of candidates.

On at least two occasions during the coaching search, it is believed Alabama presented an outline of compensation plans unsatisfactory for the prospective candidates. The first such time was early in the process with an unidentified agent and most recently with Rich Rodriguez. The Rodriguez deal was so unspectacular his dissatisfaction leaked to the media, something unprecedented. The next Alabama offer is expected to be sufficiently large enough to "get any coaches attention." There was some concern mentioned that while this is the intention of the administration, it was the intention last time, but somehow was subverted during the Rodriguez negotiations.

Auburn's academic scandal deepens

2006-12-10T13:42:00.000-08:00

An internal audit revealed grade changes for an athlete without instructor knowledge. The story in today's NY Times explains how the grade change helped the unidentified athlete graduate. The story contains some interesting information about the scandal at Auburn.

Of particular note is this paragraph:

The athletic department has maintained that it does not do scheduling for athletes, but the audit showed that someone with knowledge of the system had helped the athlete who received the four A’s and graduated with a 2.01 grade point average.

Cheerleaders!

2006-12-10T08:06:00.000-08:00

Vote for Alabama's cheerleaders at sportsline.com.

ALSO: I believe some information will be available later (nothing officials, but I expect to hear something) today regarding Alabama's internal evaluation of the coaching search and in what direction it will move. As soon as I get anything, I'll post it.

Is Alabama committed to success?

2006-12-08T23:02:00.000-08:00

Someone asked me this question today, "Is Alabama committed to success?" I quickly wanted to answer the question, but I was interrupted with a follow-up question. "Has Alabama done anything in the last ten years to indicate it is committed to achieving success?"

My inclination was to blow this question out of the water. Of course Alabama is committed to success and would do what it took to achieve success.

Then reality set in.

Over the last decade the University has done nothing to indicate it wants to win.

My interlocutor, Socrates-like, took me through the last decade's malaise. First Mike Dubose. Then probation and Dennis Franchione followed by Mike Price and his lap-dance obsessions. Then Mike Shula. And we all know about Shula, as a three-week old corpse was more animated and more competent to be head coach in the SEC when compared to Mike Shula.

Of course the University's troubles do not end there. Travel back a bit further and you would see former president Andrew Sorensen and former athletic director Bob Bockrath running Gene Stallings out of Tuscaloosa. Should we go further and point out Joab Thomas hiring Bill Curry instead of Bobby Bowden?

In any analysis, Alabama doesn't look like it is capable of doing what it takes to win.

When you reach this conclusion, the next question must be, "What is the cause?"

In my opinion, there is a faction within the University administration, within the athletic dept. (bureaucracy) and within the board of trustees with the sole intention of self-aggrandizement; this faction's sole purpose is to exercise power over the football program--to control it as a fiefdom. It is this junta that has engineered the leaks and with a compliant press has scuttled the first phase of the coaching search. Just like this junta engineered leaks to keep Mike Shula's job safe.

Something must happen quickly to save the University from itself: a leader must stand up and force change. Dr. Witt must terminate the troublemakers. If the University ever hopes to achieve anything again, Dr. Witt must lead the University across Jordan.

Whatever Dr. Witt decides to do, the coaching search must continue. This coaching search is now a disaster, but it is in adversity that greatness can shine. This can be salvaged, but only through strong leadership and supreme effort.

We must not panic. There are good coaches available and the NFL season is still underway. A handful of good coaches should be candidates if Alabama can be open minded enough to pursue a path to victory. Forget the PR ramifications. This is already a nightmare. Nothing can change this from what it already is, but with patience we can change the game and become masters of our own fate. While being patient, the University must go into overdrive to make a deal happen. No more low-balling, no more negotiating. We must present a package that "Wow's" our candidate and leaves no room for anyone else to counter-offer.

If we do not seize the initiative, clean house in the athletic dept. and make wise choices in the coaching search then Alabama football could be consigned to the dustbin of history. We must not allow this to happen.

Capstone Chaos

2006-12-08T12:46:00.000-08:00

Alabama’s coaching search shocker today has insiders and fans looking for someone or something to foot the blame. A large focus is on Mal Moore, but I’m told serious anger from within the administration for the leaks, which many view damaged this search process from the very beginning. The leaks were engineered to damage the coaching search.

No need to panic

2006-12-08T07:41:00.000-08:00

If there is one thing Alabama fans can do is panic. Take a deep breath and hang out for word. Sure the Birmingham News, ESPN and other publications have done everything possible to sabotage this coaching search. Nonetheless, ignore the panic from talk radio and message boards and watch tidesports.com because they are the only accurate source of information amongst the major media outlets.

Have faith. Things usually have a way of working out for the best.

Coach Rod @ Alabama; a nobody at Miami

2006-12-07T21:16:00.000-08:00

According to multiple media outlets today Coach Rich Rodriguez has or would accept the Alabama coaching job. (The Tuscaloosa News reported tonight almost everything was done and the Birmingham News reported it was a done deal.)

Listening to the media today was surreal. Whether it was Chris Fowler or another dumbass media blowhard somehow they found a way to criticize Alabama. They'd bash Alabama as being desperate or they'd bash Alabama fans for "unrealistic expectations." Even local sports reporters bash Alabama. Get any of the state's media together and you'll hear almost nothing good about Alabama. In fact you'll hear smartass cracks and a general condescending lecture about the "rednecks" associated with the University.

Since Mike Shula was fired, what have ESPN and other media outlets done?

They've ridiculed Alabama and said it was a job nobody wanted.

It looks like Alabama was a job lots of people wanted and one of the hottest names in coaching accepted. The other premiere job open this season was Miami. Guess what! It was the job nobody wanted. First one and then another turned the U down. Miami even contacted Rodriguez. But guess what, he'd rather have Alabama than the U.

Will we see ridicule heaped on Miami for their fourth-rate hire? Of course not! It is Miami. It is hip and cool. But if Alabama had been forced to hire an assistant, we'd never have heard the end of it.

Diversion? Conspiracy? Theories abound in Tide's coaching search

2006-12-07T08:05:00.000-08:00

Several emails sent to me over the last week contained interesting speculation that Spurrier, Saban and now even Rodriguez were diversions from Alabama's true coaching candidate. These emails contained often extensive analysis of why so-and-so would be the next Tide coach. These missives also contained detailed theories of how people close to the University (and sometimes these other coaches) conspired together to make this diversion a reality.

Please.

Alabama couldn't keep a secret if its life depended on it. For such a conspiracy to work, more than a dozen individuals from within and outside the Alabama family would be required to not only keep hot gossip SECRET, but to undertake a willful misinformation campaign.

That isn't what is happening. What we are seeing isn't the product of willful misinformation, but the results of a tightly controlled information environment. So few people have a true picture of what is going on inside the corridors of power that they take the scraps of information they have and fill in the blanks. Thus, ordinarily reliable sources have become unreliable.

It isn't some grand scheme, but simply human nature that people usually in the know don't want to be seen as being outside like the rest of the Alabama nation.

Other tidbits: Based on today's Tuscaloosa News story, a decision was being made last night and in the early hours of this morning. Presumably, the decision would be a choice between waiting on Saban or hiring Rodriguez. This could mean we would know something as early as today. Watch Coach Rodriguez for clues. If he isn't the man, he'll reaffirm commitment to WVU soon; if he is the man then he'll probably be introduced soon. For an analysis of Coach Rodriguez and his offensive style click here.

No decision yet in Tide coaching search

2006-12-06T20:41:00.000-08:00

The paper of record, The Tuscaloosa News, reported in Thursday morning editions, a decision would soon be made on the direction of the coaching search.

The presumed decision would be between waiting for Saban or hiring Rodriguez. The report in the Tuscaloosa News also said it could not confirm a report from Fox 10 of Mobile-Pensacola which said University officials were meeting with Saban about the job. Paul Finebaum reported on his radio program Jimmy Sexton, Saban's agent, denied the report.

The flight information is possible; however, it should be viewed with extreme caution. A source I know said the Fox story was preposterous, but then said Saban was still on the University's list. Take that for what it is worth.

Report: Alabama to interview Saban

2006-12-06T15:05:00.000-08:00

Take it for what it's worth. TV station Fox 10 says Saban to talk with Alabama.

UPDATE: Finebaum talked with Saban's agent Jimmy Sexton around 6:30 p.m. Wed. evening. He reported on his radio program Sexton said "no truth to that report whatsoever...Saban is not talking to anyone."

Report: UA ready to offer Rodriguez

2006-12-06T09:30:00.000-08:00

The Birmingham News is reporting UA will offer job to Rodriguez if he wants the job, citing three anonymous sources.

Alabama Football breaking news on al.com

ALSO: Tuscaloosa News reports Moore back in Tuscaloosa; Rodriguez in meeting with WVU AD.

Be sure to check out the comment section (or click here) for in depth discussion and analysis of the latest news related to this story.

For commentary on Rodriguez, his offense and analysis on the chances of success in the SEC click here.

Saban name won't die; Rodriguez meeting one aspect of search

2006-12-05T20:48:00.000-08:00

The paper of record's take on the Rodriguez meeting and Saban's lingering candidacy for Alabama's head coach.

Be sure to check out the comment section (or click here) for in depth discussion and analysis of the latest news related to this story.

Is it Rodriguez? What about his offense?

2006-12-05T15:51:00.000-08:00

With the 90-minute Tuesday afternoon meeting between Mal Moore and the Rodriguez family does this mean the deal is almost consummated?

A face-to-face meeting indicates a major change in the Alabama coaching search. It doesn't mean a deal is imminent; however, the meeting has escalated the stakes for all parties involved. If it is going to be Rodriguez then expect something to happen within the next 48-hours. It seems unlikely Rodriguez would have a meeting and then just sit around waiting on a telephone call for days or weeks.

Offensive question mark
While most Alabama fans are not upset with courting Rodriguez, there is an element of fans who dislike Rodriguez. Complaints range from:
He doesn't play defense
His offense isn't smashmouth
It isn't ball control

Each of these complaints is a perfect example of what's wrong with not only Alabama football but all sports--Fans who think they know something, but actually know nothing at all.

I'll be the first to say I hate the spread option. I'm not convinced it works with the speed of the SEC. Florida's offense has been horrible this year; I'd point out Florida's offense was more incompetent than Mike Shula's or a Gene Stallings-era offense (as an example take a look at the Auburn game.) A lot of luck and a good defense helped Florida this year. In a couple of years when Urban's system and players are all in place at Florida, expect worse results than his first season. This year was an aberration, not a vindication of the spread option attack in the SEC. Contrary to most opinions, I believe the SEC was substantially weak this season (I expect the SEC to win no more than 4 of its bowl games.) When you consider the weakness of this year's SEC teams and all the breaks Florida caught during the season, you cannot say the spread option helped Florida. If anything it hurt.

With that said, Rodriguez has impressive credentials. His offenses at Tulane, Clemson and West Virginia showed great skill at understanding how to attack defenses.

Whatever football is, it is a game of one-on-one matchups. Therefore, exploiting the one-on-one matchups which favor your team is the secret of success in any offensive or defensive scheme. Rodriguez has shown an ability to utilize his strengths and attack the opposition's weaknesses. I agree there are questions and Rodriguez would be smart to immediately address his offensive plans, if hired, but his history is good and without a doubt next season's offense under Rodriguez would be 1,000-times better than Mike Shula simply because Rodriguez understands discipline and fundamentals. Shula's teams were horrible because they weren't tough and weren't disciplined.

That won't happen under a coach like Rodriguez.

The criticism of many of today's coaches by some Alabama fans centers on the "smashmouth" problem. These fans say "This is Al-uhhh-bamm-uhhhh, we play smushmouth footbull here."

Do these people even understand football?

Bryant's teams in the 1960's (while tough players) relied on a pro-style passing attack and featured luminaries like Joe Namath and Ken Stabler. When Bryant transitioned to the wishbone in the 1970's, the wishbone/option-style offense is a very dangerous offense since the ball is regularly unsecured for long periods of time during each play. The option is often considered a smashmouth-type offense, but it is not. The option is a finesse style offense that uses execution, misdirection and options to overcome defenses. That's why smaller schools like the service academies utilize this offense.

One thing observers of football should understand is the game is cyclical. Offensive styles come in and out of favor. However, there are certain constants. First, you must be able to run the football (and it is very important to be able to run between the tackles.) Second in my opinion, you must throw the ball deep to stretch the defense vertically. This stretching the defense helps your running game and also helps the short and intermediate passing games. Of course the most important elements of an offense is the ability to pass protect and run block. If you can accomplish those two important points, any style offense will work in any league.

Rodriguez and Moore meet in NYC

2006-12-05T13:38:00.000-08:00

Rodriguez has informal meeting with Mal Moore in NYC.

Moore to meet with Rodriguez; Saban name lingers; Grobe on list?

2006-12-04T21:23:00.000-08:00

Moore to meet Rodriguez in NYC at some point today, sources said in this report.

Sorting out the search: No chance for Stoops & Nutt?

2006-12-04T17:04:00.000-08:00

Disclaimer: This post includes the use of the word Source or Sources, as such it should be taken as seriously as anything written by a West Virginia publication or the Huntsville Times.

According to a source, Bob Stoops will not be the next coach at Alabama. In fact, Stoops name has not crossed anyone's desk. Why? Because nobody at the University thought Stoops would be interested. When pressed about some of the Internet rumors such as the NCAA troubles, these were all dismissed. So, Stoops doesn't seem to be a realistic choice at this time.

Another name mentioned in a few emails today was Houston Nutt. I'm told Nutt is "respected" in UA circles, but he is NOT under consideration for the Alabama job.

I hesitated to write the post on Stoops and Nutt because who knows what is going to happen and it would be easier to just say the situation is fluid and avoid responsibility for putting this information out into the discourse. However, I do feel the information on Stoops and Nutt is accurate--neither will be coaching Alabama.

As always hold anything a "source" says under intense scrutiny and take it with a grain of salt. Throughout 2006, sources within the Alabama program have pushed a personal agenda (saving Mike Shula, making the administration look bad for firing Shula, etc.). Unfortunately, most media organizations have failed to use journalistic discretion in judging the reliability of its sources.

Rise Up! Let's fight media bias

2006-12-04T07:47:00.000-08:00

The anti-Alabama bias in media has been clear for many years; however, these last few weeks showcased the negative climate toward the state and the University's football program. Let's work together to expose the biggest anti-Alabama bias in the local media. Share your comments and let's identify who does a bad job and who is doing a good job (share examples please!).

Monday: Saban out and Rodriguez focus

2006-12-04T06:01:00.000-08:00

The focus on Sunday switched to Nick Saban thanks to a Huntsville Times report, which said Saban would interview for the job. Of course, Saban doesn't seem as if he'd interview for anything. If someone at Alabama wanted him to interview that would be as stupid as asking Bobby Bowden to interview for the position in 1986. Therefore, the Huntsville Times report was fallacious. Just like most things coming from Newhouse newspapers this year.

Rodriguez reportedly has been contacted again about the Alabama job. This time by the headhunter helping Mal Moore, according to the Charleston, WV newspaper.

Likewise, don't expect Rodriguez to interview. At least that is one thing that makes sense from the Birmingham News story this morning.

With Mal Moore and others in New York City, expect a formal conversation to take place with Rodriguez and perhaps another candidate or two if things begin to unravel.

But the NYC trip indicates no coach would be named until Dec. 7 or 8, perhaps even as late as Dec. 11 or Dec. 12.

Other Alabama news: Tidesports.com tells us about the Independence Bowl, how to buy tickets and the status of Alabama's backup QB Jimmy Barnes. Barnes injured a knee during practice.

Candidate du jour: Nick Saban

2006-12-03T08:01:00.000-08:00

Today all eyes will focus on the Miami Dolphins as speculation has shifted from Rich Rodriguez to Nick Saban.

Why? Several message boards are abuzz with rumors and of course when Cecil Hurt speculates in his column that Nick Saban of the Miami Dolphins, "either has or hasn’t removed himself, depending on who you believe. (I’m still leaning in the “hasn’t done so" direction.)" then you've got what some believe to be an indication of what insiders at the University may be thinking.

And of course you have a Huntsville Times story (picked up by Florida newspapers) saying Saban would interview for the Alabama job.

It is just speculation, but Hurt is the most informed journalist in the state and his words carry far more weight than any other journalist. Also, Saban's name has remained atop the wish list, according to just about every single person you talk with close to the administration (or just about any fan.) Combine that with what anonymous sources said and you've got the recipe for serious speculation this morning.

If Saban says following the game: "Hold the rope," we'll know something is up. (And if you can't figure it out, I'm joking about hold the rope!")

Hold the rope?

2006-12-02T20:54:00.000-08:00

What a choice of words for Coach Rodriguez following WVU's win over Rutgers.

Want to know Alabama's next coach? Well, don't ask the media

2006-12-01T21:13:00.000-08:00

Friday was a bad day for journalism. Alright, this whole week was bad for journalism.

Throughout the entire week, and for that matter most of the football season, newspapers and television stations have been getting the Shula story wrong.

But why?

There are many factors.

Take a look at tonight's disaster from West Virginia. Early this afternoon, The West Virginia MetroNews broke a story declaring Rich Rodriguez and Alabama were getting close to a deal. The basis of the story were their own sources within the University of WV and a Pat Forde report on ESPN radio. You can listen to Paul Finebaum's interview with the writer Greg Hunter.

The only problem with the story? Forde didn't report what Hunter thought.

The problem here is simple enough (or at least easy to theorize about.) Hunter's sources within UWV indicated Rodriguez wants the Alabama job. So, Hunter knows on his end the deal could be done. All that was missing were facts from the Alabama side. He or his staff heard what they wanted to hear from Forde and, presto, a story was born.

The big problem here was the MetroNews based its report on someone else's report.

As if that were not enough to give West Virginia journalists a bad reputation along comes the State Journal. It reported a deal was close between Alabama and Rodriguez.

This report was based on a source close to Alabama. Unfortunately for the writer, he was also interviewed by Paul Finebaum.

The interview with Gannon was painful. Finebaum exposed several problems with the story, but none were as glaring as Gannon's admission the story was based on a single-source.

Why would the news organization allow such an important story out without additional sourcing?

I'm going to suggest an answer. Inexperience.

Being a weekly newspaper the staff probably deals with what most weekly newspapers report: the largest tomato at the county fair, the quilting bee and the chamber of commerce parade.

A single source will do when writing about the Christmas parade, but when it is something important like a coaching search, you would be better off getting some confirmation.

But why wouldn't the journalist seek confirmation? Isn't that common sense?

Perhaps, but there are significant problems with journalists, which impair their ability to do their jobs.

First, a post on the media critic blog at National Review from November hints at how the role of the reporter changed post-Watergate. The post explains how the decline of journalism coincided with the rise of college training. This blog entry posits, liberal excesses of academia created much of the problems in reporting: "The reporting jobs were taken from blue-collar types just trying to do a job and given to college-educated idealists on a mission."

I'm not sure this observation is completely accurate; however, the 'idealist' part is right, but only partially. Most journalism graduates are obnoxious know-it-alls who denigrate anyone who does not agree with them or their interpretation of the facts (on everything from politics, to restaurants, to the weather.) Good reporters are able to filter through the information, tell both sides of the story and always remember the truth is the most important element of the story.

But to be a good reporter, a young journalism student must be willing to learn--to soak in the knowledge and experience of those around them.

Today's young journalists come to newspapers filled with arrogance and are unwilling to learn from the senior staff. These graduates believe they learned everything in college. They studied Quark and learned how to use a camera; therefore, they know all they need to know.

This hubris handicaps young reporters. They lock into one interpretation on a story and then look for evidence to support that interpretation, rather than exploring the depth of the story. An article today is less a journey into truth and more an essay supporting the writer's preconceived notions. In other words, most newspaper articles today are merely commentary or analysis masquerading as news.

Second, writers are lazy.

Give a writer a 1,000-word assignment due in one-month and you'll get it in one month. Give that same writer the same assignment for a 1,000-word story due in one-week and you'll get almost exactly the same story with very little extra work done in the longer timespan.

That is not to say writing isn't hard. It is. I struggle with it.

But the mindset of many writers is to find the easiest way to get the story done. Some of that deals with deadline pressures. Some of it deals with bad morale in media organizations. But a large part of it deals with how writers are serious procrastinators. Naturally, quality suffers when writers aren't focused on doing a good job.

Good reporters are able to do their job without taking shortcuts. Unfortunately, there are fewer and fewer good reporters out there.

And some wonder why nobody trusts the media...

2006-12-01T15:20:00.000-08:00

Listening in to Finebaum's show this afternoon was enough to make anyone want to cry about the reliability of today's journalists. Wow. West Virginia media outlets have about as much credibility as the Birmingham News.

UPDATE: MAL MOORE RELEASES STATEMENT

2006-12-01T14:49:00.000-08:00

TUSCALOOSA–University of Alabama Director of Athletics Mal Moore released this afternoon the following statement regarding the status of the search for a new head football coach:
“While I remain committed to not engaging in a lengthy public dialogue on the progress of our search for a new head football coach, I want all of our fans and supporters to know that we appreciate and understand the tremendous interest in this process.
“I am very pleased with where we are in this search. I know there have been many rumors speculating about candidates and timelines and, while I won’t get into specifics of who we are interested in, I want everyone to understand that we have not contacted any college coaches who have not yet completed their regular seasons.
“While I do recognize the need to get a head football coach hired soon, I am less concerned with following a timeline than I am about making sure we hire the right person for the job.”

Alabama near deal for new coach?

2006-12-01T14:00:00.000-08:00

According to this story in the West Virginia Metro News, Alabama is close to a deal with Rich Rodriguez. Also, there is an alleged Sunday 10 a.m. mandatory team meeting for the Mountaineers. Take these reports with big doses of salt.

UPDATE: PAT FORDE repudiates report in WV Metro News on Finebaum show.

A second West Virginia story on the situation.

However, one major element in support of this story was our earlier dictum which said expect reports to filter from outside Tuscaloosa in the prospective coach's camp. One element of this story, which is important for readers was this paragraph:

several sources within the West Virginia athletic department have indicated that Rodriguez has said he is ready to accept the Alabama job, if offered, and that he’s already talking to members of his staff about accompanying him to Tuscaloosa.

A bump on the road to a new coach? Alabama officials feel search is on track

2006-11-30T22:08:00.000-08:00

UPDATE: The unreliable Birmingham News has posted this update which indicates Spurrier is interested in the job and the University would continue to pursue the deal. I'd urge you to remember the source.

While there may be no deadline, there is a roadmap to a new coach, according to sources close to the Alabama search.

But what makes any source so sure?

The best sources and indicators told us a big deal was at hand with Steve Spurrier, but now everyone has soured on that potential deal.

We've cautioned for over a week that "sources" (even high placed) would be less reliable due to the compartmentalized nature of the search. Essentially, Mal Moore is about the only one who knows from moment-to-moment what is happening and even he doesn't know that much.

Many "sources" are already breaking out their talking points to discredit the Spurrier-Alabama flirtation. One presentation through various "sources" in the Alabama family says Spurrier was never Alabama's first choice and not seriously pursued. This seems highly unlikely and stretches credulity. The best information available from a variety of sources and news organizations indicated Alabama presented a serious offer to Spurrier. All persons following the coaching search should remember the lessons from the Shula firing. Lots of individuals were putting out false information through media outlets. All information should be filtered through the BS-detector.

An interesting story being presented Thursday morning by the paper of record, The Tuscaloosa News, was the idea this search had no deadline. Other "sources" were putting out information Thursday afternoon and evening the search could take two-weeks or longer to reach fruition. It could be an indication the University is talking with an NFL coach (as some have said, throughout the process.) However, and Alabama fans should keep this in mind with the parties involved, this could be part of a Cover Your Ass strategy. Such a strategy would lower expectations of a quick resolution so that if a deal is wrapped-up next week then administration officials could claim victory.

One of the big problems for media outlets and "inside sources" in this search is Mal Moore's tendency to tell everyone what they want to hear. It was the same situation during the Shula firing. Moore would listen to the pitch then agree with it. It seems the same type of situation is underway in that Moore gives conflicting information to subordinates and others close to the situation. It has substantially hindered the reporting of this story, and shows little sign of change.

Does that mean there is not legitimate information floating around? No. Certainly, there are plenty of facts which have leaked, but as always keep watching tidesports.com for the best information in regards to what is happening inside the coaching search.

If you believe the Birmingham News...

2006-11-30T06:39:00.000-08:00

...then you are a fool.

At what point this season has anything written in that paper been correct about Alabama's coaching situation?

First, Shula has at least two more years. Then Shula would make staff changes. Then Shula is going to survive. Then the Dewey defeats Truman moment on Monday morning, when a real newspaper, The Tuscaloosa News, had Shula's firing front and center and the Birmingham News was saying Shula ready to press forward as coach.

And now the story saying Spurrier won't be here. Don't make me laugh. Are these the same reliable sources the News utilized through this season? If so, I'll take what the deputy athletic director's third-cousin's, sister's hairdresser's, TV repairman said. I know it'll be more plausible and more reliable.

The News story might be accurate. Very accurate. However, there is nothing in the track record of the Birmingham News this football season that should give anything it says about Alabama footall any more weight than something coming out of Tommy Tuberville's office.

Take for a moment an analysis of what we know this morning based on other media outlets.

Alabama has asked permission to speak with Steve Spurrier, according to the Mobile Press-Register. So far, the Press-Register is the only reliable Newhouse publication in the state.
Alabama has presented Spurrier an offer, according to WAKA of Montgomery last night. Now the Press-Register says no offer has been presented. It is our opinion that both stories are correct. Spurrier was given only a preliminary outline including expected salary, contract length and other powers.
One good element from the Birmingham News was Wednesday's column by Kevin Scarbinsky. "If you believe the statements from both Saban and Spurrier denying interest in the Alabama job are necessarily the last words on the subject, I believe you've never paid close attention to a coaching change before." That is an important thing to remember. What coaches say usually never corresponds to what coaches do.

As we've cautioned all week, an offer does not equate to a deal. I've had no feeling or what I'd consider reliable information on our chances with Spurrier. But unlike others, we've pointed out Spurrier was a target--just like we pointed out about a week before others we had information indiciating Dr. Witt had decided to move in a new direction with the football program. The Birmingham News story might be correct, and it should be used as an antidote to an irrational exuberance among fans. But I wouldn't believe it.

FLASH: FOX6 Birmingham reporting Spurrier-Moore to have face-to-face meeting; Bamamag backing off 2p.m. presser

2006-11-29T19:41:00.000-08:00

UPDATE: Tidesports.com has a blog entry on the Spurrier rumors.

UPDATE: WAKA Montgomery reporting contract offered. For those wanting a link, here is a link to a story from a television station saying Spurrier is offered from "multiple confirmed sources."

UPDATE: Karle on Fox 6 @ 10 p.m. said a source said Moore wants a face-to-face meeting because if Spurrier is going to say no then it needs to be face-to-face. Fox 6's Dubberly reported Spurrier's brother said Spurrier would not be leaving South Carolina. ANALYSIS: That is Karle covering his ass in case the report of a face-to-face meeting is wrong. No AD would try for a face-to-face unless he felt he had a great chance at success. If Karle's source is accurate then a meeting would indicate some type of deal. Also, Bamamag apparently has modified its report on a press conference tomorrow. No idea if this would be revised at a later time.

Spurrier mulls Alabama offer

2006-11-29T17:00:00.000-08:00

Alabama has contacted Spurrier on at least two occasions following the termination of Mike Shula, according to sources familiar with the negotiations. These two contacts between intermediaries led to what some have called a "critical" phase of the negotiations.

Alabama is in a holding pattern pending Spurrier's consideration of a multi-million dollar offer. There is no expected timetable; however, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution columnist Tony Barnhart said in his Blog the next 48-hours would be critical. This could indicate South Carolina (and its Chancellor former University of Alabama president Andrew Sorensen) are preparing a counter-offer in an attempt to prevent Spurrier from leaving. Despite a brave face, South Carolina officials and fans are now taking seriously Alabama's interest in Spurrier. The reports out of the Gamecock camp are eerily similar to the reports during the exodus of Dennis Franchione from Alabama.

Reports have varied on the extent of Alabama's offer. We reported last night Alabama would offer Spurrier a 7-year contract with $4.28 million per year. Today, Scott Moore of Southern Sports Tonight (a radio show in Ft. Walton Beach, FL.) reported a $3.3 million per year 7-year contract with a $5 million signing bonus was offered to Spurrier.

The offer is viewed by persons close to the University administration as being a signal that Alabama is not going to make a mistake this time. Spurrier is being pitched unlike any previous Alabama coaching search in the post-Bryant era. On tonight's radio program, Paul Finebaum said the Alabama attitude represented a "paradigm" shift in thinking at the University.

While the Spurrier option is being hotly pursued by the University, additional options have also been outlined by Athletic Director Mal Moore in accord with the administration's desire to have a successful coaching search.

As we cautioned last night, an offer does not equate to a deal; however, the situation is fundamentally different from the situation when Bobby Bowden was told he must follow the interview process to become coach at Alabama. Alabama is presenting its case in a positive way despite the critical reports in national, regional and some local media outlets.

Fighting Irrational Exuberance: The Spurrier Bubble

2006-11-28T20:49:00.000-08:00

While there is substantial (and credible) evidence in circulation at the moment that Steve Spurrier is Mal Moore’s target, we caution that even if Spurrier is the target then there are hundreds of things which could impede the deal.

Furthermore, there is always the possibility the information is incorrect.

It would be unwise to presuppose an offer equated to a deal. Such irrational exuberance is indicative of a need within the Alabama program for a great coach. While it appears there is something good on the horizon, caution should be exercised in viewing these rumors and other “reports” on the Internet.

For the most reliable information on Alabama athletics look to tidesports.com. They broke the news on Shula’s termination and are the paper of record for the University.

RUMOR: Spurrier contacted; offer pending

2006-11-28T15:17:00.000-08:00

Officials with Alabama made contact today with Steve Spurrier, according to the best information available. The preliminary conversation was a prelude to where Spurrier would be presented an offer. The offer could be presented to him as early as tonight with a $4.28 million per year contract for seven years.

Post-Shula Briefing

2006-11-27T20:13:00.000-08:00

It is sad when everyone from online sites like blogs, discussions boards and the Tuscaloosa News beat larger publications like the Birmingham News and the Huntsville Times to a story. The Birmingham News has a serious problem in its operation and should seriously consider appointing an ombudsman to investigate its editorial operations. While such a post would not need to be permanent like the position at the Washington Post, there should be some mechanism appointed to assure the public the News would strive to be a fair, accurate and timely source of news.

We were right and feel vindicated in our report last week that Dr. Witt had abandoned the Shula camp and decided to fire the football coach. Also, while we have taken shots at Bama Online (yes, we called them Pravda on a couple of occasions), they should be commended for trying to report Shula's firing last week. Unlike the Birmingham News, that publication at least saw the handwriting on the wall and tried to report the story. While the early report was wrong in many respects and the website took criticism on talk radio shows, the organization was doing what it should be doing, trying to uncover the truth. The Birmingham News and Huntsville Times were the voices of propaganda throughout the Shula fiasco. And the Dewey defeats Truman moment of reading this morning's Birmingham paper was something disturbing.

On to the briefing, What we know (...or at least think we know)

Informal contact began last week before the Thanksgiving holidays. When Mal Moore said today he had not talked to a coach, it might be technically true, but it is not accurate.
From the best information available, we do not believe Alabama has concluded a deal with any coach.
We believe Alabama has one primary candidate. We believe Dr. Witt insisted a plan be in place before firing Shula. The plan outlined contingencies and while there is a primary candidate, the University has other options prepared. This coaching search should be more organized than the previous debacle.
We believe a substantial offer is on the table. It is very hard to cut through all the rumor, because even people who should know are getting polluted with gossip. In our opinion, we believe an offer was made to a coach for seven years at $4.28 million. It seems the financial incentives give a strong clue toward the direction the search has taken as only a handful of names would warrant that type of money. Of course, the information on this is sketchy, but at this point it seems reliable.
As always, the place to watch for Alabama football breaking news is the Tuscaloosa News available online at tidesports.com. We've repeated this in other briefings but it always serves as a good reminder for fans. Information coming from "sources" during a coaching search are highly unreliable due to many factors. The key factor being so few people are included in coaching search discussions. WHAT TO WATCH FOR: We believe the news of a new head football coach will not come from Tuscaloosa. News of a coach coming to Tuscaloosa most likely will break from a reliable media source in another state. The reason? If Alabama goes after an established head football coach, then the competent media covering the program will pick up the scent of a story and report it. If the University decides on a coach, then word could leak from the incumbent coaches camp prior to an official announcement on Shula's status from the University. This is only an analysis, but based on the attention most football programs are under, it is increasingly difficult to keep matters a secret for extended periods of time.

SHULA OUT AT CAPSTONE

2006-11-27T06:11:00.000-08:00

"He who learns must suffer. And even in our sleep, pain that cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart. And in our own despair, and against our will, comes Wisdom by the awful Grace of God". -Aeschylus

May this difficult time for Mike be profitable for him. May he learn some important lessons that would benefit him in his next business venture. We all wish him the best and know his faith will sustain him during a difficult time.

Shula out at the Capstone

Mr. Moore, Dr. Witt, Time has run out

2006-11-26T20:00:00.000-08:00

The Jeopardy theme has concluded. The fourth-quarter clock has expired. There is no time left for University leaders.

This is it. Like Ernest & Julio, it's time--time for a decision.

I won't recite the reasons why we all like Mike Shula or why Mike Shula should be fired.

Whatever side of the argument a Tide fan falls on, we are all in agreement that this must stop.

The delay is not fair to Mike, his coaching staff or the fans. People want to know what is going to happen to something they cherish and University officials must give them the answer on Monday morning.

With usual indifference to the rest of the world, University administrators went on holiday, while everyone else was forced to wonder about the course being chartered for Alabama football. Fans tracked airplanes, speculated on message boards, posted on blogs and have called every person remotely connected with the University because they were a potential "source" of inside information.

For whatever the reason, officials have failed to say anything. But the silence has spoken loudly. It has proclaimed: "We are not leaders." Or at the very least they have no sense of how important time is. Time is a precious commodity. And with each moment that Shula hangs in limbo the University, Mike Shula and the football program are damaged.

It seems whatever guides the University's decisions, it is as non-functional as the Legion Field clock of so long ago. And just like that clock, everything is frozen.

Perhaps the University doesn't know what to say or how to say it. Perhaps the school doesn't want to appear ungrateful to Mike for all he has given and done for the University. That is understandable. It is reasonable to admire Mike for all he tried to accomplish. But it is now time to say goodbye.

University officials should keep in mind a line from Shakespeare, "Action is eloquence!" Administrators would be wise to memorize that quote.

Team meeting...

2006-11-26T18:46:00.000-08:00

We've all been waiting for the team meeting set for tonight at 9 p.m. The team meeting is for the purpose of check-in, schedules and possibly more. The media is supposed to have reporters there to try to see if anything leaks from the meeting.

IF Shula was told today he has been fired, then tonight would be a perfect time to talk with the team. Nothing is certain in this situation (come on, the University simply MUST say something soon!), but we still believe the best information indicated Dr. Witt reached a decision last week to terminate Shula. If Shula was informed today (following the administration's return from holiday vacation) then the team would get the information tonight and perhaps the press would get the information tomorrow since many media members would be there anyway for the basketball press conference.

We hope to have at least official word on Shula's fate SOON.

UPDATE: Memphis Tider along with Fox 6 and other media outlets report no news from tonight's meeting.

BamaMag post might be of interest to you guys interested in the next football coach at the University.

But I'm not going to hold my breath. This holiday weekend may have been something positive for the administration, but it has been horrible for the fans. The University has a responsibility to act in the best interest of the fans, players and coaching staff. I do not think this limbo was very good for Shula or his assistants. Bad news is best delivered fast and frankly.

A twist to the Spurrier rumor: UA jet visits Kentucky

2006-11-26T14:52:00.000-08:00

For people reading the tea leaves on who the next coach will be at Alabama, a trustee jet is in Kentucky.

Of course, this could be an air ambulance by its designation, but don't let it stop the speculation.

Leaks could be coming soon...

2006-11-25T20:15:00.000-08:00

If a deal has been reached, it is only a matter of time until leaks begin to filter out. Again, we expect the first reliable leaks to come from outside the state.

ALABAMA CRISIS: How Mike Shula got fired

2006-11-25T13:14:00.000-08:00

A timeline of what some think were Mike Shula's final days as Alabama football coach

We've been saying for the last week the best information available indicated Dr. Witt and Mal Moore had decided to change leadership in the football program. We believe that is still the case. We've been working on constructing a timeline of how Shula got fired. Of course, while we've been doing that someone comes along and works out a very reasonable and we think informative scenario for how things played out this week. This was taken from a poster on the tidesports.com message boards (Et Tu, Robert?) and modified slightly with information from a story from bamamag.com and some other sources. NOTE: I'm not certain everything in this outline is correct, but several of its elements fit many of the facts as we know them.

Theory: On Saturday night Shula was told by Mal Moore that he and President Witt wanted a plan on what Mike Shula was going to do to return Alabama to the top of college football. At the Sunday teleconference, Shula said everything was under consideration, "and that means everything." Still, Mal Moore and President Witt wanted to hear specifics of what Mike Shula was going to do to change things. Mike Shula comes in on Monday and Mal Moore goes to see him and asks Mike what his plan is to return Alabama to the top. Mike Shula says the usual things he says in pre and post game press conferences, and Mal tells him at the end of the meeting, that what he has laid out is not good enough. He tells Mike to get a solid plan together, because we are meeting with President Witt and Chancellor Portera in the morning, and you had better have a great plan to turn around Alabama football.

Mike Shula shows up on Tuesday morning, and goes to a meeting with President Witt, Chancellor Portera and Mal Moore. ***There is no external verification that Dr. Witt or Portera were at the Tuesday meeting between Moore and Shula, but there is an indication that Dr. Witt was (at the very least) privy to the discussions***

All three men listen to Mike's plan, which is really nothing more than what he had told Mal the day before, which is NOTHING. He touches on making coaching changes, but he has no real plan to do anything, and he says he will work on a plan during bowl practice. (NOTE: Here is some information from another source BAMAMAG) Shula's lame plan for improving the team included: Shula giving up play calling, reassigning Ungerer to tight ends and offensive tackles, and giving David Turner special teams.

Mal asks Mike to leave the meeting and go back to work, and once Shula leaves, the three men look at each other and shake their hands and say, "...this guy does not have a clue to what he is doing. We have to make a change, or this could get real ugly in 2007."

There is not much argument that Shula must go, so that is why there is not a statement in support of Shula, and Shula goes home for the Holidays thinking he still has his job. He has heard from no one of what they think of his performance, but he knows that he might have blown it because he has no commitment from anyone by close of business Wednesday.

What Mike Shula did not know is that President Witt put into place a plan to contact head coaches representatives within an hour of the end of the loss to Auburn (possibly even before the game), and this process was proceeding as Mike Shula was attempting to explain why he should come back to Alabama and keep his job. Alabama probably contacted over 12 coaches representatives, and quickly settled on 3 to 4 different guys to choose from, in case they decided to fire Mike Shula.

On Wednesday, after Mike Shula's camp had released multiple unauthorized leaks to the media that Mike Shula would be back in 2007, President Witt and Mal Moore got very mad and put out a statement that did not mention Shula at all, on purpose, which countered the idea that Shula was on safe ground to keep his job in '07. By late on Wednesday Shula knew he was in deep trouble, and the Shula camp got together and tried to get a response from someone at Alabama, but were told we are still evaluating the situation, and the Shula's went to their Thanksgiving weekend not knowing if Mike will be back in 2007.

Alabama continued it's talks with head coaches' representatives over Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, and I would guess by this evening Alabama has a deal in principle to bring in a new head coach, and that they are ready to pull the trigger on Shula, fire him that is, unless something drastically changes.

Other things to consider in a timeline: Moore met with Shula prior to the LSU game and Shula's game plan against LSU was different and more aggressive than it was against other teams. Does this indicate Moore had already warned Shula a change was imminent unless things turned around? Also, Shula seemed more emotional with his players during Iron Bowl week and spent longer with them following the loss. This would indicate some knowledge prior to a post-Iron Bowl meeting. In any case, it helps to understand

Spurrier to Alabama: X-Files--The Truth Is Out There!

2006-11-24T18:26:00.000-08:00

Since everyone else is speculating and making stuff up (see Kevin Scarbinsky's Wednesday column in the Birmingham News), I decided I should have some fun and develop my own conspiracy theory for why a coach would be coming to Alabama. So, since it is the eve of the South Carolina-Clemson rivalry game, I might as well have fun with Steve Spurrier!

Spurrier's name has surfaced repeatedly since rumors of the Alabama job began to percolate. Why? Let's apply an old axiom: Where there is smoke, there is fire! Someone connected with the football program (even if only remotely connected) said something to someone and BINGO you've got yourself a wildfire of gossip. I'm not suggesting Spurrier isn't coming. In fact there is a lot of evidence out there to suggest Alabama could be targeting him or Saban or Petrino or anyone of another 5-10 top-notch coaches. What I am trying to say is the Spurrier rumor has been a regular feature of talk even before the Auburn game. Thus, from a conspiracy theorists viewpoint, it could easily mean something is going on.

Then you take all those clandestine "airplane" trips around the south by the different jets and you've got yourself some interesting speculation! And I don't want to be left out of the speculation! So, here's my take on why Spurrier is headed to Alabama.

Trustees led by Paul W. Bryant, Jr. Flew two roundtrips to Stuttgart, Arkansas on Wed., Nov. 22. These clandestine trips were not for any other reason but a secret meeting! How do we know this? Because Stuttgart Municipal Airport also was the destination for a flight from (are you ready for this?) Columbia Metropolitan Airport. That's right, Columbia, South Carolina! http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N323P
An aircraft chartered from the Tuscaloosa Airport flew on Thanksgiving Day from Tuscaloosa to Oconee County Airport (the airport near Clemson). This aircraft is still sitting at the Oconee Airport. Don't you see?!?! This airplane will fly Spurrier out of Clemson after the big game. He'll be introduced in Tuscaloosa on Sunday or Monday! If there is nothing else our BoT does, it is plan ahead and this prepositioning aircraft is a master-stroke of logistical planning! Way to go Coach Moore and Dr. Witt! http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N10797
But there is MORE than just these airplane flights! If Paul Finebaum is such good friends with Steve Spurrier, why hasn't he called the coach and asked him about the Alabama rumors? Why? Because he already knows it is a done deal (through other sources) and doesn't want to mess it up. He called Saban's agent Jimmy Sexton on Wednesday as soon as the Saban rumor was printed in the Birmingham News. So, why won't he call Spurrier? Because he already knows!

When you consider these factors and combine them with the already known information regarding Alabama's flirtation with Spurrier, it is easy to see who the next head coach at the University will be! Of course, I've also heard a rumor that Bill Curry is coming back as head coach and that either Ray Perkins, Steve Sloan or Terry Bowden would be the next Athletic Director!

Seriously, I'm not ruling anyone out right now. The coaching hunt is the most difficult because so few people will know anything about what Coach Moore and Dr. Witt are thinking. It is frustrating because at least in Washington you get more leaks than this. I'm still optimistic that we'll hear something from an out-of-state leak soon.

ALABAMA CRISIS: Friday Morning Briefing

2006-11-24T06:41:00.000-08:00

Hope everyone had a great holiday and gets to enjoy the football today. It looks like the holiday really shut down the flow of news (just like the University wanted). Also, perhaps some Shula-fatigue has begun to set in amongst the fan base and even the media. With football games going on, it should reignite attention post-Thanksgiving.

Here's what we know (...or at least think we know)

The Birmingham News actually provided some good information! Kevin Scarbinsky's column today included information about Shula's buyout and how the contract allows the payments to be structured. "Besides, it won't take nearly as much money as many people think to replace Alabama coach Mike Shula," Scarbinsky wrote. Will wonders never cease! The Birmingham News writing something NOT right out of the pro-Shula playbook.
Did the Huntsville Times reveal its source in today's column by John Pruett? Pruett's column deserves special attention since The Huntsville paper broke the story earlier in the week that Mike Shula would be retained. Pruett's column begins with a discussion of all the rumors out there, but quickly moves into why he considers the information from the Paul Gettis story valid:
"Having conversed with the source ourselves, and taking into account his
credentials and his relationships with all the principal parties, we believe
this person's credibility is above reproach. If we hadn't believed it, we
wouldn't have published a story on condition of anonymity...."
The story goes on to say the source could be right today and wrong on Sunday, or the source could be wrong because he was blindsided by the decision makers. The clincher of the column is this final piece:
But if any of that happens, nobody will be more surprised than Mike Shula, who expects to go recruiting Monday morning, and who also fully expects to begin bowl practice on Dec. 2.
I believe this is a avery interesting indication of who or at least where the information came from. If this is an indication of where the information came from, shouldn't the newspaper reveal that type of information when it identifies its source? Who the source is, is valuable and an important piece of information; as much detail about the source should be included in the identification so the reader can judge the veracity of the report. If the source of the information was the Shula camp (as indicated here) then at the very least, the source should be identified as someone close to Coach Shula. To do anything less betrays the readers.
We believe, based on the best information available that nothing has changed in regards with Dr. Witt's decision to pursue leadership change in the football program. In fact, we feel the pro-Shula leaks and the subsequent Mal Moore statement indicate there is almost no chance Shula would return. The leaks are believed to have soured the mood of the administration.
WHAT TO WATCH FOR: We believe the news of a new head football coach will not come from Tuscaloosa. News of a coach coming to Tuscaloosa most likely will break from a reliable media source in another state. The reason? If Alabama goes after an established head football coach, then the competent media covering the program will pick up the scent of a story and report it. If the University decides on a coach, then word could leak from the incumbent coaches camp prior to an official announcement on Shula's status from the University. This is only an analysis, but based on the attention most football programs are under, it is increasingly difficult to keep matters a secret for extended periods of time.

What's wrong with the Birmingham News coverage of Alabama football?

2006-11-23T07:19:00.000-08:00

The largest newspaper in the state is a joke when it comes to covering Alabama football. The newspaper has become the mouthpiece for the pro-Shula camp, with quotes obviously designed to mislead the public.

Earlier this month we pointed out the problems with a Birmingham News story by Ian Rapoport, which insisted that Mike Shula was safe at Alabama. the story also asserted that University officials anticipated a six-to-seven-year recovery period. The centerpiece quote from the story was: "Insiders believe he is safe. Nothing is certain, but it is unlikely Moore would fire Shula or order him to fire any assistants. More likely is that Moore would advise Shula at season's end that dismissing an assistant is painful but sometimes necessary. Moore and other decision-makers recognize the impact of NCAA sanctions and the resulting shallow recruiting classes. In fact, Shula was hired with the belief that it could take six or seven years to fully restore the program. Whatever Moore decides, the Board of Trustees likely will support him."

Since this column ran in the Birmingham News on Nov. 8, a host of other questionable stories were published by the state's largest newspaper. Yesterday, the News published a column by Kevin Scarbinsky that said Alabama had offered Nick Saban the job. Unfortunately, Scarbinsky is hardly credible since he said during a previous Alabama coaching search Bill Parcels wanted the job. And just like the Parcels rumor, Scarbinsky's column was quickly rebuked. This time, Jimmy Sexton, Saban's agent, said in the Tuscaloosa News that the story was untrue.

This morning, Ray Melick has written an attack piece straight out of the pro-Shula camp's playbook. Melick claims Mal Moore and Dr. Robert Witt are acting worse than Dennis Franchione. He goes on to use the scare-tactic coming from the pro-Shula camp over how bad this is hurting recruiting.

Somehow I think losing big games and losing the Iron Bowl has a greater impact on recruiting than all the speculation around Shula. Everyone knows Shula has to perform next season or he is gone (and that is IF he were retained; something impossible now thanks to the pro-Shula leaks) so you can't tell me that fact isn't already being used in the recruiting wars.

The Birmingham News has a responsibility to report the news. But during the entire Shula crisis, the newspaper has published questionable information under the guise of fact. The newspaper has been a major player in an attempt to subvert the administration of the University. The newspaper has published only one side of the Shula fiasco, and that is a major failure of its editorial controls.

The Birmingham News has failed to deliver for its readers. The newspaper should appoint an ombudsman to investigate the major journalistic failures of its sports reporting. The ombudsman should then report his findings not only to the newspaper leadership, but the general public.

ALABAMA CRISIS: Evening briefing

2006-11-22T18:36:00.000-08:00

What we know (or think we know...)

The statement issued by Mal Moore was a restrained, but significant rebuke to the Shula camp. IF Shula had any hope of being retained before the leak fiasco began, it is finished now. Tempers most certainly were ignited over the leak to the Huntsville Times, etc. The pro-Shula people appear to have over-played their hand and sealed the deal with regards to Shula.
At this time, we do not believe there is any chance of Shula being retained. Even if the University were unable to find an acceptable (top-tier) coach, the mood has soured such that it would be difficult to keep Shula. The Thanksgiving break might cool tempers; however, most of the anger is not directed at Mike Shula, but rather his supporters.
Dr. Robert Witt wants the University to look good, but the leaks and innuendo have hurt this element of his plan. Dr. Witt could be the most intractable personality in any type of resolution which would allow Shula to stay at the University. These considerations make it almost impossible to see a way back for Shula.
As we cautioned this morning, the Birmingham News Kevin Scarbinsky column must be viewed with a skepticism. Scarbinsky was the one who wrote during a previous coaching search that Bill Parcels wanted to come to Alabama. Take everything coming from the Birmingham News and Huntsville Times with a grain of salt. For the paper of record involving the University of Alabama athletic programs, visit tidesports.com.
WHAT TO WATCH FOR: We believe the news of a new head football coach will not come from Tuscaloosa. News of a coach coming to Tuscaloosa most likely will break from a reliable media source in another state. The reason? If Alabama goes after an established head football coach, then the competent media covering the program will pick up the scent of a story and report it. If the University decides on a coach, then word could leak from the incumbent coaches camp prior to an official announcement on Shula's status from the University. This is only an analysis, but based on the attention most football programs are under, it is increasingly difficult to keep matters a secret for extended periods of time.

ALABAMA CRISIS: morning briefing

2006-11-22T06:10:00.000-08:00

What we know (or at least think we know...)

When will this end? Is a common question right now. We've been saying for days that next Monday was a date we heard from reliable sources. The Tuscaloosa News report last night along with some other reports Tuesday morning validated that. We believe the University will announce something no sooner than Monday if it decides to retain Mike Shula. The most likely scenario now is that the longer this plays out the more likely Shula stays. That is the oppositiv of how it was just a few days ago. What changed? The coaching hunt. The longer it takes before a decision and word leaks the better the chances for Mike Shula. However, that makes Shula a lame duck and Alabama may have more options on the table than we previously thought.
The search started at the request of Dr. Witt is now the central part of this drama. We've felt for the last couple of days very strongly that Dr. Witt indicated a need for leadership change in the football program, provided it would benefit the University. To make a change, the University must have a solid, reliable and popular replacement. Otherwise, the "football experts" at the University would be furious as would the alumni and general fan base. According to this morning's Birmingham News, the University has contacted Nick Saban's agent and there is an offer on the table. "If Alabama is going to fire Shula a year after giving him a new contract with a hefty pay raise, the school wants to hit a home run. Saban would be a walk-off grand slam," the article said. Now, we should be careful in how we judge this. Remember, Scarbinsky was the one who wrote during a previous coaching search that Bill Parcels wanted to come to Alabama. I believe this is the hardest part of the entire process to judge. Why? Because there are fewer people who know about the targets, thus fewer leaks. Is Saban the target? Most credible information at the moment would indicate that he is. However, there is information available that leads us to believe Alabama has more than one target.
Unlike previous coaching searches, we feel Alabama has at least two fallback positions. Again, this is very difficult to verify, but we've heard it from multiple sources that Alabama has options within options. This type of strategy was required by Dr. Witt. He does not want to come off looking badly; however, there is believed to be a growing feeling of irritation in the administration that leaks have been designed to injure the president and the coaching search.
We must use care in evaluating all reports. There is a tendency from every "expert" with an agenda to become an anonymous source for newspapers, internet sites, etc. We'd offer some advice on judging sources. First, the Tuscaloosa News is the paper of record for the University of Alabama athletics. If it is real, you'll find it on tidesports.com because Cecil Hurt is the person closest to the story. All other newspapers have descending credibility. Keep in mind the Birmingham and Huntsville papers have been used by the pro-Shula faction to put stories out for the last month. (At some point following this saga, I'm going to write an essay going over the poor journalism from these newspapers.)
WHAT TO WATCH FOR: We believe the news of a new head football coach will not come from Tuscaloosa. News of a coach coming to Tuscaloosa most likely will break from a reliable media source in another state. The reason? If Alabama goes after an established head football coach, then the competent media covering the program will pick up the scent of a story and report it. If the University decides on a coach, then word could leak from the incumbent coaches camp prior to an official announcement on Shula's status from the University. This is only an analysis, but based on the attention most football programs are under, it is increasingly difficult to keep matters a secret for extended periods of time.

ALSO: For continued discussion, analysis and updates on the discussions regarding Spurrier visit Memphis Tider.

ALABAMA CRISIS: EVENING BRIEFING

2006-11-21T16:56:00.000-08:00

What we know (or at least think we know...)

The Huntsville Times reported a knowledgable source said Shula would return as coach of Alabama next season. Knowledgable source raises some interesting questions similar to the sourcing issues we raised about a couple of Birmingham News stories earlier this month. This report is credible provided the source is accurate, but where does this source get his information? Is this a university insider? Is this the athletic director? Is this a trustee? The nature of the "knowledgable source" is very important to judging the veracity of the report.
Tidesports.com writer Cecil Hurt posted a story citing "sources close to the University athletics department This story repudiates the Huntsville Times posting. Shula did meet with athletics director Mal Moore on Tuesday afternoon, but one source said Tuesday that evaluation was “still ongoing.”
It was believed that Dr. Witt had decided to seek leadership change within the football program. We feel strongly this is accurate information. The president is believed to be concerned over the lack of discipline and the general malaise around the football program. This seems to be a strong repudiation of the Shula regime. The discipline issues on the team and bottle-throwing fan incident are believed to be heavy factors in the president's thinking.
The Tuscaloosa News report validates what we've believed as the timetable for the decision-making process. We've said something should happen by Monday (possibly sooner.) The Tuscaloosa News report says nothing until after the weekend.
We feel strongly the University is searching for a big-name football coach.
WHAT TO WATCH FOR: We believe the news of a new head football coach will not come from Tuscaloosa. News of a coach coming to Tuscaloosa most likely will break from a reliable media source in another state. The reason? If Alabama goes after an established head football coach, then the competent media covering the program will pick up the scent of a story and report it. If the University decides on a coach, then word could leak from the incumbent coaches camp prior to an official announcement on Shula's status from the University. This is only an analysis, but based on the attention most football programs are under, it is increasingly difficult to keep matters a secret for extended periods of time.

The time to save Alabama football is now! Let the powers that be know where you stand!
Chancellor Portera - Mportera@uasystem.ua.edu
President Witt - witt@pres.ua.edu
Mal Moore - mmoore@ia.ua.edu

Laughingstock? How Alabama could be at low tide

2006-11-21T15:07:00.000-08:00

Let's assume the Huntsville Times report is correct and Shula returns. What does that mean for Alabama football?

It means Alabama football is truly a laughingstock. It is a laughingstock for many reasons:

The administration is leadership challenged. If Shula was the man for the job all along, then why did they let him twist in the wind for three days following the game?
Assuming the university was coach hunting, they embarrassed the University by courting other coaches and then failing (miserably) to land one. Alabama fans would have to endure the taunting of fans from around the south that we can't land a decent coach--that Mike Shula is the best we can do.
We are a laughingstock on and off the field. We have a real discipline problem with players. They do not represent the University very well. In addition, we have a (most likely intoxicated) fan throwing a bottle onto the field. The school is a shadow of what it once was.

The time to save Alabama football is now! Let the powers that be know where you stand!

Chancellor Portera - Mportera@uasystem.ua.edu

President Witt - witt@pres.ua.edu

Mal Moore - mmoore@ia.ua.edu

Huntsville Times: Shula to return?

2006-11-21T14:30:00.000-08:00

Huntsville Times story says so.

Analysis: If this turns out to be correct (it probably is very well researched and sourced) then the fault rests not only with the administration, but with the fan base. We the fans should've taken the warnings more seriously from some people close to the program that urged us to email or fax the administration regarding our displeasure with the status quo. A large concern is the fact that Mal Moore did not show real leadership at all during this crisis.

ALABAMA CRISIS: Could $$$ allow Shula to stay?

2006-11-21T13:00:00.000-08:00

Alabama's football program, awash in cash according to the annual statements filed with the NCAA, may be trying to hire a replacement coach for under market value. A growing fear among anti-Shula forces around the University is that Shula might be able to retain his job because of mismanagement of the behind-the-scenes coaching search.

This fear must be taken with a grain of salt, because most of the anti-Shula people around the program have the tendency to be happy one moment and inconsolable the next. However, there is serious concern amongst everyone (pro-Shula and anti-Shula) that Moore has misled them during the last few weeks regarding Shula's job security.

Supporters of Moore point to his leadership during coaching searches. They have said Moore did a good job in hiring Franchione (a hot commodity at the time). Moore is also praised for bringing in Mike Price. It was believed amongst many of the football "elite" around the University that Price would be a success because of his offensive philosophy. Moore supporters give him a free pass when it comes to the firing of Price for immoral conduct. Most of the criticism of the Price-era gets focused on Dr. Witt. Moore detractors are highly critical of the the entire Price situation. Critics point to the Price fiasco as proof Moore does not properly vet his coaching hires.

Now with what is considered Moore's willingness to tell people what they want to hear, a growing frustration has emerged. This frustration may be one reason the anti-Shula forces are pessimistic about Moore's ability to hire a new coach.

ALABAMA CRISIS: morning briefing on Shula

2006-11-21T06:07:00.000-08:00

Here's what we know...(or at least think we know)

Dr. Robert Witt has agreed with the "football experts" to fire Mike Shula. The basis of the decision included poor performance (nothing worse than losing games in an expanded stadium), discipline problems on the team, and overall appearance that Shula has lost control of the football team. The president is believed to be concerned about the negative perceptions created by bottling-throwing incidents and other outgrowths of the currrent malaise around the football program.
Dr. Witt asked for a list of names. These names would be used to evaluate and plan a "contingency" for leadership change in the football program. The names were to be gathered by unofficial contact. If no "reasonable" replacement were found then Dr. Witt would stick with Shula. However, the longer the situation goes on, the more likely the "football experts" have found a viable candidate.
Mal Moore is telling everyone on every side of this situation what they want to hear. Is that a shock? That's alawys been Mal Moore's behavior. He is a politician and that's why he is good at raising money.
As posted several times, contrary to most reports, there has been a timetable to move through this as fast as possible for the benefit of Shula, his coaches and their families. Oh, and not to mention recruiting, something the "football experts" at the University feel is very important. Also, everyone involved wants to calm the fan base as soon as possible. We've thought Monday was the most likely time for something to happen, but whatever could unfold prior to that, especially if it looks like a suitable replacement for Shula can't be found.
If Shula is not fired this year, then he will have another chance to save his job next season; however, University officials have all but written-off next season if they are forced to retain Shula.

So, it all comes down to finding the replacement. Nothing's changed since yesterday. What has created so much confusion about the situation is Mal Moore. He tells everybody exactly what they want to hear. Thus, people report something and then get nervous when Mal appears to have changed his mind. What Mal Moore tells the president is most important and from all indications he has told the president a change is warranted.

The Mal Moore Factor

2006-11-20T20:33:00.000-08:00

I just got about a dozen emails asking about Mal Moore's alleged equivocation on the Shula matter.

Relax. It may not be that bad. Mal Moore is telling everyone what they want to hear in this situation. In case you haven't noticed, that is how he always operates. The decision has been made to seek a replacement and Shula will only be retained if a suitable replacement isn't found, at least that is the most reliable information around.

EDITORIAL: Thank you Mike Shula!

2006-11-20T19:19:00.000-08:00

With all but official word that Mike Shula is out at Alabama (the only thing holding up the announcement is hiring a replacement), it is time to thank Shula for his efforts over the last four years.

Shula came into a difficult position when he accepted the job as head football coach at the University. The NCAA sanctions were only part of it. Alabama was tarnished by the alleged sexual indiscretions of Mike Price. Shula came in after spring practice and did the best he could to right the listing ship.

While Shula's efforts were not enough to lift the team to a conference or national championship, he restored order to the chaos of the football program. Chaos created by the incompetence and corruption of the Mike Dubose, Dennis Franchione and Mike Price era.

Shula inherited a lot of problems and worked hard to set the school on the right path. It is sad that Shula did not succeed because if anyone deserved to win at Alabama it was Shula. He is a nice guy, a great family man, a descendant of the legendary NFL coach Don Shula and a winning quarterback at the University. You can't help but pull for the guy. We all hoped and prayed he would turn the corner, but it was not to be.

As Alabama ends this relationship with Shula, all of the fans should unite in saying a thank you to Shula. While it was not all that we wanted, Shula remains a part of our family and we wish him all the best.

LATEST RUMOR: MIKE SHULA FIRED

2006-11-20T15:24:00.000-08:00

It is believed that Dr. Robert Witt has decided to remove Mike Shula from the head coaching position at the University. The decision is contingent upon finding a replacement. The president is said to respect and hold Shula in high regard, but strong lobbying efforts from the "football experts" may have convinced Dr. Witt to make a change despite hopes that Shula could salvage the season, the team and University prestige. Discipline issues on the team along with academic and other performance indicators are thought to have played a part in the rumored decision. The off-the-field arrests combined with the bottle-throwing fan incident may have played a part in the decision.

Alabama makes unofficial contact

2006-11-20T11:15:00.000-08:00

UPDATE: Growing indications that an overture is underway to create a "contingency plan" for a leadership transition in the football program.

Rumor has it that university supporters were told by Dr. Witt to gather a list of potential replacements (via unofficial back-channel contact.) This list would be utilized in an analysis of the current Alabama situation and whether or not a change would benefit the school.

The University is moving swiftly in its decision making process and wants to tell the coaching staff and the University family something soon. The timetable, according to sources close to the university, is by next Monday-possibly sooner. As soon as possible, probably early next week (though it could happen this week) would be a public statement of support or the termination. Dr. Witt and Moore are anxious to avoid the "vote of confidence" fiasco, which created more speculation earlier this season. If Shula is retained, expect something beyond a vote of confidence, but short of a contract extension.

The reason for the short timetable is a belief from football experts within the University that some resolution must take place quickly for the fans, the coaches (and their families) and recruiting. It would not be fair to keep Shula and the other coaches in the dark for very long, a person close to the University said. In addition, if Shula and his staff are going to be out recruiting, football experts want Shula to be in a strong and definitive position, something harder since the fifth-consecutive Iron Bowl loss.

ALABAMA FOOTBALL CRISIS: WHAT WE KNOW...

2006-11-20T06:46:00.000-08:00

(or at least think we know)

Mal Moore and President Robert Witt spent some hours of the weekend evaluating the status of the football program (it brings in over $65 million per year to the Unviersity and is a considered an important part of the overall institution.)

A faction of football supporters applied intense pressure to President Witt after the fifth-straight Iron Bowl loss to Auburn. The lobbying effort subsided for a time Sunday afternoon, which indicated some type of decision might have been made (possibily to retain Shula).

Late Sunday afternoon, some prominent Alabama football supporters appeared in despair and encouraged other fans to "rise up" and force a change. That also would seem to indicate either a decision or some type of support for Shula (it also indicates a belief that there is still time to influence the future of the program.)

The contact information for the three most important persons in the Shula decision are:
Chancellor Portera - Mportera@uasystem.ua.edu
President Witt - witt@pres.ua.edu
Mal Moore - mmoore@ia.ua.edu

ALSO: you can reach MAL MOORE by fax (205) 348-2196
you can reach Robert Witt by fax (205) 348-8377

In other news, Dennis Dodd, the cbs.sportsline.com columnist) who has defended Shula earlier in the season added this gem to his latest weblog: The end? Don't be surprised if Mike Shula is fired. The loss to Auburn was that bad.

Let Alabama know how you feel about Shula

2006-11-19T16:28:00.000-08:00

TIME IS RUNNING OUT TO SAVE THE CRIMSON TIDE!

The time to save Alabama football is now! Let the powers that be know where you stand!

Chancellor Portera - Mportera@uasystem.ua.edu
President Witt - witt@pres.ua.edu
Mal Moore - mmoore@ia.ua.edu

UPDATE: And according to a poster on tidesports.com here is the email address for Mike Shula's biggest supporter on the board of trustees:
James W. Wilson III - j.wilson3@jwamalls.com

RUMOR: Alabama decision close?

2006-11-19T11:00:00.000-08:00

According to the latest gossip floating in from multiple people around town, that lobbying efforts have ceased and what may be a consensus decision has been made concerning Shula's future.

Spurrier downplays Miami

2006-11-19T10:20:00.000-08:00

Spurrier said he is 'not a candidate' for Miami job.

BREAKING NEWS: MORE ON SPURRIER & MIAMI

2006-11-19T09:10:00.000-08:00

Sources within the Miami program say the would target Spurrier, according to ESPN.

If Spurrier is in play, there is no reason for the University not to approach Spurrier with an offer.

ALABAMA: The new Auburn?

2006-11-19T07:51:00.000-08:00

After four years, Alabama fans know their team is close. The question is, to what? Being what they think Auburn used to be?

The pro-Shula supporters are few and far between on this day after the Iron Bowl. Ray Melick's column in the pro-Shula Pravda-like Birmingham News even raises the questions most fans are asking themselves.

Taken together, the Melick column and Cecil Hurt's column are major hits to the Shula regime. Assume for a moment that Witt is still making a decision, these columns deliver devestating body blows to any defense of Mike Shula.

BREAKING NEWS: Spurrier rumored ready to leave South Carolina

2006-11-19T07:36:00.000-08:00

CSTV: Spurrier Could Be Next Miami Head Coach, Sources say coach ready to leave South Carolina

Sources say the old ball coach is ready to bolt from South Carolina. The question is where would he want to go.

RUMORS RAMPANT: WHAT WE KNOW

2006-11-18T20:07:00.000-08:00

(or at least think we know...)

Contrary to all the emails, message board postings and other rumors, we don't believe any decision on Mike Shula's future has been made. Indications from various sources are that University officials are considering the future direction of the program. More specifically, some people close to the University are lobbying President Witt for a change.

Cecil Hurt's column up on Tidesports.com

2006-11-18T19:47:00.000-08:00

CECIL HURT: Does Alabama have the best coach it could have?

Wow. Amazing column that points out what we've all known for a few days that:

One has to hope a decision is coming soon; from all indications Witt is the person at the center of the discussion. I could be wrong, but Witt decided to fire Price and from what I hear, Witt will make the call on Shula. "It’s been debated over the past few weeks and, despite what some have said, there was no firm answer reached before the Auburn game." But now the game is done and the heat is much higher.
Mike Shula is a nice guy, but isn't getting the job done. "...the gap between UA and the league’s top programs seems to be widening, not narrowing."

FINEBAUM: 'Serious conversations going on right now'

2006-11-18T19:44:00.000-08:00

Paul Finebaum said on Fox6 Sports tonight that "serious conversations" between Mal Moore, President Robert Witt and others were going on behind the scenes.

"I think he is in that much trouble based on his body of work," Finebaum said.

SOURCE: Heavy lobbying underway

2006-11-18T18:45:00.000-08:00

It is believed, according to someone close to the University, that serious background discussions are underway by officials outside the athletic department. The lobbying effort centers on convincing the University President, Robert Witt, that Mike Shula should be let go. How extensive the lobbying effort might be is not clear; however, Witt's loyalty to Shula may not be as strong as once thought. It is believed that Jim Wilson III's efforts to lobby Mal Moore earlier in the week were a direct result of the efforts already underway to push Shula out as head football coach.

SPREAD THE WORD: SHULA BALL IS OVER AT ALABAMA

2006-11-18T16:30:00.000-08:00

THIS IS A MAKE OR BREAK WEEKEND FOR ALABAMA. Let everyone know about this site. Let's put the pressure on the University by drawing attention to this situation. AL.COM and other message boards need to be informed about this site. Let your friends know by email.

You can also email specific stories from this site to your friends by clicking on the mail icon below each post.

EDITORIAL: A winnable game lost not by talent, but by coaching

2006-11-18T16:03:00.000-08:00

Once again another Iron Bowl loss. This is the worst stretch for Alabama football since before Bryant was coach at the University.

In searching for causes, you can look no farther than the coaching staff. Some problems in the game were the problems which have plagued Alabama all season:

Poor line play. The line gave up 11-sacks last season. This season not as many, but the collapse of the right side of the line caused two fumbles. The critical failures led an incompetent Auburn offense to 14-points.
Game management: The 2-point conversion before halftime made sense. Provided you thought you would need a field goal to tie the game. Of course, that field goal type mentality is what hurts this team's philosophy. There is no killer instinct.
The failure to get a field goal in the fourth quarter and burning timeouts put Alabama into a much tougher position than it should've been in. Not everything is Shula's fault, but his assistants have done nothing to help him this season. Ungerer, Connelley, Woods, et al must go. If Shula is allowed to stay at the University.
Shula's gambles this season were often ill-conceived. John Madden said it best, "Sometimes the hardest thing to do is the smart thing." Shula's mistakes in game management hurt the team's chances all season and especially in the big rivalry games of Tennessee, LSU and Auburn.
Special teams:Could the special teams play have been worse this season? Penalties on kickoffs, poor punt returns, etc. Starting in a hole all the time is a good recipe for failure.

Conclusion: The University must fire Mike Shula and replace him with a competent coach. While Shula is a likeable, he isn't getting the job done. The team isn't tough. It isn't able to execute and it isn't disciplined. The final verdict is that Shula is not ready for primetime in the SEC.

COACH SHULA RUMOR: What was N1UA doing in Augusta this week?

2006-11-17T19:02:00.000-08:00

From Nov. 13-16, N1UA registered to the Crimson Tide Foundation, was in Augusta, Ga.

Speculation around the trip built Friday evening as word of Mike Shula's standing as Alabama head football coach was coming under fire from members of the University's board of trustees.

We here have no word on what the trip to August involved (was it a normal golf outing, business trip, or coach hunting?). But since it is a major rumor of the moment and the trip was verifiable via flight data, it is being hotly discussed.

UPDATE: Paul Bryant Jr.'s plane was also recently in Augusta. This information lends credence to the suggestion the plane was having routine maintenance.

RECAP: Shula situation more uncertain than previously thought

2006-11-17T17:14:00.000-08:00

New details regarding the Shula situation were discussed today, which creates a better picture of the crisis. Clearly, at this moment, Mike Shula is not as safe as the Alabama football coach as previously thought. Odds are that Shula would return; however, there is information which contradicts the conventional wisdom:

Jim Wilson III has been working the phones all week calling Mal Moore lobbying that Mike Shula should keep his job.
At least one major trustee has been lobbying University officials to fire Shula. Indications are this trustee could be Bryant.
Most well-placed media sources have refused to speculate on Shula's status. Cecil Hurt of the Tuscaloosa News said today that Shula's future was still uncertain. Hurt said he felt that no decision on Shula's future had been taken. That leads to the belief amongst most people that the Iron Bowl game would play a critical role in determining Shula's future.
The Birmingham News, in Kevin Scarbinsky's column, stated in Friday's edition that Shula would return next season. The column went further to say that Moore would not even pressure Shula to make staff changes.

ANALYSIS: Why would Wilson need to lobby Moore if the situation was not more critical than Shula supporters thought? The fact Wilson is spending time working the phones shows how critical the situation has become inside the politburo. This takes on a different shape when we understand that one influential trustee has already decided that Shula must go.

The media situation is a complex, but important element of the story. Cecil Hurt has been the one media voice closest to the situation in the program for the last decade. He has the pulse of the program. He's not willing to make a definitive statement. That means he is getting conflicting information. His only definitive statement is that no definitive decision had been made regarding Shula's tenure. That's big.

The Birmingham News has taken on the role of spewing the pro-Shula line for at least the last football season. Either the News has chosen some trustee sources (and other sources within the athletic department) who are grinding axes and pushing an agenda in print, or the Birmingham News is just wrong on this story through misunderstanding the information given by the sources. In any case, the information from the News has to be considered highly suspect (probably more suspect than something coming from Bama Online or BamaMag.)

No options ruled out on Shula

2006-11-17T13:22:00.000-08:00

Cecil Hurt said on today's Finebaum radio show that from what he has heard, "No options removed from the realm of possibilities," for the Alabama football program.

Nothing definitive has happened, Hurt said. He said many options for the future of the program are on the table. He said the outcome of the football game could impact the calculus in whether Shula is retained or let go.

Behind the scenes lobbying for and against Shula at Alabama

2006-11-17T12:46:00.000-08:00

Finebaum questions the veracity of the Kevin Scarbinsky column in today's Birmingham News. Finebaum asked a simple question, if Shula's job is so safe, why has Jim Wilson III been on the phone consistently lobbying Mal Moore to save Mike Shula's job? In addition, Finebaum said Ray Perkins has also been lobbying to save Shula's job at the University.

What is up with the Birmingham News? First, we get the column last week, which was riddled with questions over some assertions about Shula's job. But even that column suggested staff changes would be required. The News seems lost in reporting the story of Mike Shula.

Coaching rumors: If Shula is out, Chan Gailey might be in

2006-11-17T09:44:00.000-08:00

Alabama talk from The Sporting News
The Alabama rumors continue to swirl. A source told me today that if Mike Shula leaves the Capstone, that a guy to watch for the job is Georgia Tech coach Chan Gailey.

So, who hopes Mike Shula holds on another year if that rumor is true?

Shula speculation: Keeps job, NO STAFF CHANGES

2006-11-17T07:04:00.000-08:00

While the accepted wisdom was that Mal Moore would force Shula to make changes on his staff if the Alabama head football coach was retained, this column from the Birmingham News says otherwise, according to a source.

"One Alabama man who has discussed the subject with AD Mal Moore said, win or lose, Shula will not be fired and will not be forced to make changes on his coaching staff. That's not a popular opinion, at least when it comes to staff changes, and it'll be less popular if Tuberville runs around Bryant-Denny Stadium waving an Iron fist. But that's what should happen."

That is depressing news. It doesn't mean Shula won't make changes, but he won't be required to make changes. Shula simply must get rid of at least 3 assistant coaches (special teams, offensive line and running backs). If Shula won't pull the trigger on those assistants then while Shula may survive this year, and may survive next season, he will be fired at some point. Alabama fans should always remember Dubose and realize that sooner is better than later.

Alabama's next offensive coordinator?

2006-11-15T20:21:00.000-08:00

Could this be the man brought into the program if Shula retains his job?

I'm not exactly excited about this prospect.

Alabama's O-Line seeks redemption

2006-11-15T08:26:00.000-08:00

"It don't take much to get up for this one," sophomore center Antoine Caldwell said. "The whole offensive front went out there and got embarrassed last year. We've got to use it as motivation," according to this story in the Mobile Press-Register.

It would've been nice had the offensive line been as motivated every week this season.

The theme of sacks and how to improve pass protection is something getting lots of attention this Wednesday. Cecil Hurt's column in the Tuscaloosa News also contains a big emphasis on that theme: “If I just say that we are going to prepare to see that it doesn’t happen again, then that sounds like we didn’t prepare last year, and that’s not what I’m saying," Rader said. “But it is important. If the quarterback doesn’t get hit, then he can throw the ball better. If he throws the ball better, we can move better. And if we move the ball better, we can score more points, which is what we are trying to do. It’s a triple-tier effect. So I guess I’m saying 'Yes, we’ve got to make sure that doesn’t happen again.’"

Let's hope there is real improvement in every facet of the offensive line play this year.

Alabama Hotties Up for Award

2006-11-15T07:09:00.000-08:00

The two houndstooth-hat wearing blonde twins at Alabama games are finalists in the Aaron's Super Fan contest at the southernsportsawards.com. You can vote for them here.

The twins, Maegan and Ashley Bailey, were featured in a Birmingham News article earlier this year. The twins are from Oneonta and are a statuesque 5-foot, 10-inches tall.

Bowling Projections: Alabama to Liberty

2006-11-13T12:46:00.000-08:00

Alabama could land in the Liberty Bowl, according to CBS.SPORTSLINE.COM

Sports Illustrated online expert Stewart Mandell has Alabama slated for the Independence Bowl.

Alabama could improve its bowl position with a win over Auburn.

Shula Apologists win victory, further censorship on message boards

2006-11-12T13:56:00.000-08:00

In what was the best run Alabama discussion board around, the apologists have scored a major victory by finding a way to get the term apologist and realist censored on tidesports.com message boards.

That is a black mark for any organization to remove perfectly legitimate words from the lexicon; however, how much worse when it is done by a newspaper company. Newspapers (more than other organizations) should have a committment to free and open discussion, especially discussion via the written word.

That lesson reminds me of a classic episode of the Simpsons: Saddlesore Galactica. In this espisode Lisa bitches and complains about her band losing a competition because another group "cheated." Eventually, Lisa takes her complaint all the way to the top, Bill Clinton, president of the United States. The episode resolves with Clinton nullifying the band competition and declaring Lisa's band the winner:
Bill Clinton: No, thank you, Lisa. For teaching kids everywhere a valuable lesson: If things don't go your way, just keep complaining until your dreams come true.
Marge: That's a pretty lousy lesson.
Bill Clinton: Hey, I'm a pretty lousy president.

Unfortunately, after what appeared to be personal dispute between a couple of posters, the Apologists win a victory by getting a perfectly viable term eliminated from posting. The lesson here is to go in, pick fights with people and eventually you can limit the terminology of the opposition.

Being able to classify your opponent is a critical element of political discourse. Often people resent being classified as a liberal or Democrat because of the particular stigma each carries; however, there can be no disputing how important the ability to classify is to debate. By censoring the word-choice of posters the moderators have taken a major step away from showing a committment to the first amendment. The moderators actions say, "The first amendment is fine, until it causes us a headache."

Yes, I'm clear that forums are a privilege and not a right. I'm further clear that newspapers own the means of production (thus they buy the ink and paper and therefore determine what is on the page; it is the same with the Internet. You buy the server and pay for its operation, you get to say what happens in the forums.) However, the actions you take speak loudly. Unfortunately, the lesson is that you can gain censorship by bitching and creating fights on message boards.

Public discourse is forever injured when restricted. Better to punish offenders than to injure all posters.

COMPARE: Shula vs. Franchione

2006-11-12T10:12:00.000-08:00

When we talk about Shula, we should keep Franchione's record at Texas A&M in mind:

TAMU football highlights under Dennis Franchione (taken from www.firedennisfranchione.com:
Overall Record 24 W 22 L
One bowl appearance Cotton Bowl 2005 Loss to Tennessee
Largest football loss is school history 2003 Oklahoma 77 TAMU 0
Never finished as a ranked team.
0-3 against Texas
1-3 against Texas Tech
0-4 against Oklahoma
The first 4 wins in 2006 were against very weak opponents. This should allow TAMU to have a low rated bowl game in 2006.
TAMU under Franchione typically looses against good teams. Under Franchione TAMU is 4-15 vs. ranked opponents.
You can see much more about Franchione's problems at A&M by visiting: Firedennisfranchione.com

Compare Franchione's record at A&M with his tenure at Alabama (while short, he did post decent records against big time opponents):
Franchione: 17-8
Tenn 1-1
LSU 1-1
Auburn 1-1
Ark 2-0
record against major SEC rivals: 5-3 (as an aside compare Shula's record agains major SEC rivals 2-13)

Franchione's tenure at Alabama was short; however, he posted good numbers. His problems at Texas A&M provide an interesting epilogue to one of the worst experiences in Alabama football history.

Who thinks Shula could do a better job at A&M than Franchione? I'm betting not even the A&M folks would make a trade right now.